Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Mech Infantry, supported by Artillerym in attack ?

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940

1.3k

W

warrafael 16
last edited by

Hi,
I don’t see this ability in AAP40 (it is listed in AAE40).
Is it done on purpose for this game ?
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
K

Krieghund Official Q&A
last edited by

It also applies to AAP40, and was corrected in the FAQ.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
W

warrafael 16
last edited by

Thanks! it makes sense
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

185

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

F

Attacking subs and defending fighters (without a defending destroyer)

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • fortytwo

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

1.3k
Views

F

We had a different understanding of how Air units defend against subs (without destroyers also defending).

The Allies had Japan on the brink and this particular buy (by the Japanese player) was to take back the DEI. However, the ANZAC wolf-pack would have just eaten it up with only the cruiser and carrier defending (thus, the Japanese player would have lost the transports and the ability to use the fighter in any offensive island maneuvers).

At any rate, we let the Japanese player change his buy (as the USA player had yet to play his turn) and drop a destroyer in with the fleet. So the game continues…
M

ANZAC infantry in Malaya

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • Mino1124

14

0
Votes

14
Posts

2.6k
Views

K

@MaherC:

pretty sure by “occupy” to get the 5 IPC one time deal you have to have boots on the ground, not planes in the sky.

That was my thought. Time to post a question… :evil:
L

Mech infantry-heavy Japan?

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • ll Duce

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

2.1k
Views

T

Since Japan has so many planes I find MI are really useful as bullet sponges. The planes provide mobile killing power, the MI mobile protection for the planes and occupation.
V

Mech inf movement question again

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • Veqryn

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

1.1k
Views

K

MaherC is correct.
I

Can I ignore a transport and yet still attack it on the same turn?

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • Incline

10

0
Votes

10
Posts

1.9k
Views

K

@jim010:

I amphibiosly attack Philipines. There is a transport in the sea zone. My BBs can ignore the transport and do shore bombardment, while I hit the transport with planes and/or other ships?

No. If you attack the transport, everything attacks it. You can either kill it or bombard, not both.

@jim010:

While I have your attention, can I build a minor factory on a zone worth 1 IPC?

No.
D

Why would you attack on J2

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • democratic leader

9

1
Votes

9
Posts

3.2k
Views

T

I think J1 brings US to the war too early. I reckon it could be the most effective move in terms of the IPCs you can make your enemies lose in one single turn, and you can easily make up for the 10 IPCs that you will loose for being neutral with the US, but in all the games I played (not a lot yet), US war machine gets rolling and ends up making the Japanese player pay.

J2 lets you position yourself better on the board, as long as you have a clear strategy of what you want to do (go all in for Calcutta, or spread out to get Sydney later on, whatever floats your boat). The problem sometimes is the lack of that clear strategy, I tended to get dispersed and pick a little bit from here, a little bit from there and then get burned.

J3 will make it very difficult for you, because the Allies can stack up forces in Calcutta. In my personal opinion it should be either J1 or J2, max.
T

Carrier went in with attack force…

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • thenorthman

8

0
Votes

8
Posts

2.3k
Views

G

The only time an aircraft is EVER going to get “trapped” on a carrier, is if you use a carrier on your own turn that has a multinational fighter on it and you have attacked with that carrier, and taken a hit on it.

So basically, this “can’t” happen to you, unless you go out of your way to make it happen, during an attack. It may make sense to do this, is some certain bizare scenario’s. But Don’t be worrying yourself about it.

Now that said, once the carrier is tipped, the aircraft trapped on it cannot be used at all, until that carrier is repaired.

The more real likely hood, is, that if you are not careful, you may, wish to take fgt’s as hits as oppossed to tip your carrier, in attacks or defense, so that your aircraft will have a friendly place to land, if the carrier is totally at sea, with no island or territories in or adjacent to the sea zone, and no other possible carriers in range, to pick up the aircraft.
A

J1 attack Hawaii?

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • avidvan

12

0
Votes

12
Posts

2.8k
Views

B

Hawaii on round 1 is a pretty dicey proposition.

With no shore shot hits, the odds are about 20% of taking the Island.
If one shore shot hits, you are at 41%.
If two shore shots hit, you are at 76%.
Yes, you can get a third shot, but I would count on three hits.
This assumes that you attach the Islands with all three transports including 3 infantry, 1 artillery and 1 tank (max 5 units since you only have 1 at Caroline)
Bottom line is that you need to be fairly lucky to take Hawaii round 1.
I think the payoff is huge, but I can’t reccomend building your strategy around something that has such a high chance of failure.

If you fail badly (brick) then the counter attack could be pretty ugly. The US has 8 planes that can reach along with 5 ships. That is 13 total units. You have (If I recall correctly) 15 total units that can reach, including 6 carrier aircraft. You will likely win. However, since they will be getting a check for $62, they can afford the losses, but you probably cannot. You gained nothing on round 1 except a few territories in China.

Too much of a crap shoot for my tastes.

21

Online

18.1k

Users

40.9k

Topics

1.8m

Posts