I think that the reason that players try to force Sealion is that they think that defeating the UK is the same as defeating Middle Earth. The way to defeat it is to win the game. The best way for the Axis to win it seems to me is playing your own strategy and forcing the Allies to react to it. The Axis have the advantage and initiative to begin the game and they need to strike hard and as quickly as possible without worrying where the UK builds a factory. Middle Earth gives the Allies a chance to stop the Axis from over-running Moscow and Calcutta but that’s all, only a chance. With no Sealion Middle Earth helps to even out the odds. With Sealion the Allies take the advantage. That’s what I have found so far.
Question in the Middle East?
-
So, here it is: If Iraq attacked Turkey from behind, would Greece help?"
….I know, I know, really dumb and really, really old but I couldn’t help it! :-D
Everyone have a great day!
Bill
-
What? Neutrals can’t attack another neutral.
-
Might work well with an axis San Francisco first approach ;)
-
-
What? Neutrals can’t attack another neutral.
Its a joke….grease and Greece are a play on words…attacking from behind, put two and two together and think in the gutter.
-
if A RACK attacked a TURKEY from behind, would GREASE help? only if your RUSSIAN for food, and there’s no sense in STALIN. :P
Great play on words :P.
-
if A RACK attacked a TURKEY from behind, would GREASE help? only if your RUSSIAN for food, and there’s no sense in STALIN. :P
Great play on words :P.
Very nice!





