Couple of notes:
All the units are British. There is no difference between UK Europe units and UK Pacific units. That is why they move and attack together. Each UK capital can ONLY collect money from and build on their side of the board territories (Exceptions: West India is Pacific Territory - West Canada is Europe Territory). For example; If India (Calcutta) is taken and West India is taken by the Axis and then UK Europe takes West India back they do not collect for it because it is a Pacific Territory. Other Allies taking West India back could collect for it. Also, if for some reason Borneo is still under British control with India captured UK Europe may not build any infrastructure there because it is a Pacific Territory and Europe money.Picture of US & Sea Zones together, West meets East
-
wow they screwed up canada alberta sakactewon and manitoba are non existint!!!
-
Those places actually exist in real life? I just called them the wilderness, lol.
-
Those places actually exist in real life? I just called them the wilderness, lol.
Alberta’s growing. Lot’s of oil.
-
Those places actually exist in real life? I just called them the wilderness, lol.
yes they do and south amarica is screwed up in that pick
-
You know why is what they call “Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba” is worth 1 IPC and Newfoundland is worth 1 too, same with BC, and I live there! BC has much more then Newfoundland. Newfies!!!
-
the prarie provinses should be worth 1 maybe 2ipcs
ontario should be worth 3ipcs
bc should be worth 1 or 2ipcs
martime provinces should be worth 1.5ipcs
quebec should be worth 2.5 ipcs -
Vee aaar Quebec! And vee are Fhhrecchhh Canaiiidion!
-
Vee aaar Quebec! And vee are Fhhrecchhh Canaiiidion!
Nous sommes Québec. Et nous sommes canadiens français.
-
@i:
the prarie provinses should be worth 1 maybe 2ipcs
ontario should be worth 3ipcs
bc should be worth 1 or 2ipcs
martime provinces should be worth 1.5ipcs
quebec should be worth 2.5 ipcsno, No, NO, NO!, NO!
The Martime shouldn’t have a value!!! Especially maybe more then BC!
-
@Dylan:
@i:
the prarie provinses should be worth 1 maybe 2ipcs
ontario should be worth 3ipcs
bc should be worth 1 or 2ipcs
martime provinces should be worth 1.5ipcs
quebec should be worth 2.5 ipcsno, No, NO, NO!, NO!
The Martime shouldn’t have a value!!! Especially maybe more then BC!
why i live in new scotland(nouvell escost(nova scotia)) theres plenty of stuff here your right on one part though nova scotia should be worth 2trillion ipcs
-
@i:
@Dylan:
@i:
the prarie provinses should be worth 1 maybe 2ipcs
ontario should be worth 3ipcs
bc should be worth 1 or 2ipcs
martime provinces should be worth 1.5ipcs
quebec should be worth 2.5 ipcsno, No, NO, NO!, NO!
The Martime shouldn’t have a value!!! Especially maybe more then BC!
why i live in new scotland(nouvell escost(nova scotia)) theres plenty of stuff here your right on one part though nova scotia should be worth 2trillion ipcs
First of all BC is much bigger then Nova Scotia (area and population.) It has plenty of resources, etc.
-
Vee aaar Quebec! And vee are Fhhrecchhh Canaiiidion!
Nous sommes Québec. Et nous sommes canadiens français.
Je suis déçu à la fois de votre français.
-
ha i live in Washington state… 50 ipcs!!!
-
@UN:
Vee aaar Quebec! And vee are Fhhrecchhh Canaiiidion!
Nous sommes Québec. Et nous sommes canadiens français.
Je suis déçu à la fois de votre français.
Perhaps because the phrase “We are Quebec” doesn’t make sense?
-
@Dylan:
@i:
@Dylan:
@i:
the prarie provinses should be worth 1 maybe 2ipcs
ontario should be worth 3ipcs
bc should be worth 1 or 2ipcs
martime provinces should be worth 1.5ipcs
quebec should be worth 2.5 ipcsno, No, NO, NO!, NO!
The Martime shouldn’t have a value!!! Especially maybe more then BC!
why i live in new scotland(nouvell escost(nova scotia)) theres plenty of stuff here your right on one part though nova scotia should be worth 2trillion ipcs
First of all BC is much bigger then Nova Scotia (area and population.) It has plenty of resources, etc.
maybe so but nova scota new brunswick and prince edward island are 1million times more importint and we have resoreses here fishing coal mining and other minerals :-P whats bc have???
-
@i:
@Dylan:
@i:
@Dylan:
@i:
the prarie provinses should be worth 1 maybe 2ipcs
ontario should be worth 3ipcs
bc should be worth 1 or 2ipcs
martime provinces should be worth 1.5ipcs
quebec should be worth 2.5 ipcsno, No, NO, NO!, NO!
The Martime shouldn’t have a value!!! Especially maybe more then BC!
why i live in new scotland(nouvell escost(nova scotia)) theres plenty of stuff here your right on one part though nova scotia should be worth 2trillion ipcs
First of all BC is much bigger then Nova Scotia (area and population.) It has plenty of resources, etc.
maybe so but nova scota new brunswick and prince edward island are 1million times more importint and we have resoreses here fishing coal mining and other minerals :-P whats bc have???
BC has more fish then them, we have more mountains, and trees, more ice, more oil. Also if Quebec split I would be willing to give up them too!
-
@UN:
Vee aaar Quebec! And vee are Fhhrecchhh Canaiiidion!
Nous sommes Québec. Et nous sommes canadiens français.
Je suis déçu à la fois de votre français.
Perhaps because the phrase “We are Quebec” doesn’t make sense?
I think it’s “Nous sommes (des) Québecqois, nous sommes donc des Canadiens français.” Or maybe it’s better “On est Québecqois.” The “des” is not translated in English, but before a plural substantive it’s either “les” or “des”. “Québecqois” can be interpretated as an adjective, without the need for “des”, or as a substantive, in which case “des” is required. I’m not sure however, ask a real Frenchman ;)
-
@UN:
Vee aaar Quebec! And vee are Fhhrecchhh Canaiiidion!
Nous sommes Québec. Et nous sommes canadiens français.
Je suis déçu à la fois de votre français.
Perhaps because the phrase “We are Quebec” doesn’t make sense?
I think it’s “Nous sommes (des) Québecqois, nous sommes donc des Canadiens français.” Or maybe it’s better “On est Québecqois.” The “des” is not translated in English, but before a plural substantive it’s either “les” or “des”. “Québecqois” can be interpretated as an adjective, without the need for “des”, or as a substantive, in which case “des” is required. I’m not sure however, ask a real Frenchman ;)
:? :?
-
@Dylan:
@UN:
Vee aaar Quebec! And vee are Fhhrecchhh Canaiiidion!
Nous sommes Québec. Et nous sommes canadiens français.
Je suis déçu à la fois de votre français.
Perhaps because the phrase “We are Quebec” doesn’t make sense?
I think it’s “Nous sommes (des) Québecqois, nous sommes donc des Canadiens français.” Or maybe it’s better “On est Québecqois.” The “des” is not translated in English, but before a plural substantive it’s either “les” or “des”. “Québecqois” can be interpretated as an adjective, without the need for “des”, or as a substantive, in which case “des” is required. I’m not sure however, ask a real Frenchman ;)
:? :?
French. Canadians, do they make you learn the other language(English in Quebec, French in the Rest of Canada) in public schools?
-
@Dylan:
@UN:
Vee aaar Quebec! And vee are Fhhrecchhh Canaiiidion!
Nous sommes Québec. Et nous sommes canadiens français.
Je suis déçu à la fois de votre français.
Perhaps because the phrase “We are Quebec” doesn’t make sense?
I think it’s “Nous sommes (des) Québecqois, nous sommes donc des Canadiens français.” Or maybe it’s better “On est Québecqois.” The “des” is not translated in English, but before a plural substantive it’s either “les” or “des”. “Québecqois” can be interpretated as an adjective, without the need for “des”, or as a substantive, in which case “des” is required. I’m not sure however, ask a real Frenchman ;)
:? :?
French. Canadians, do they make you learn the other language(English in Quebec, French in the Rest of Canada) in public schools?
probably like here in Belgium:
it would be the best and brightest solution, so it won’t happen :P