Of course it can. It makes no difference that originally it was a neutral territory. Its current status is a territory of the United States and therefore, with an IPC value of two,it can be a location where a minor industrial complex can be placed.
A closer look at the Neutrals
-
Now that we have SOME images of the board… lets have a closer look at the Neutrals and how they will play out. I think my understanding is that the LEFT leaning lines mean PRO-ALLIED and the RIGHT leaning lines mean PRO-AXIS? The straight up and down mean TRUE-Neutral?
It is hard to tell in these pictures who is who… (Lets make a list)
So far in Europe I see that Finland and Bulgaria look to be Pro-Axis, Yugoslavia and Greece Pro-Allied? Can anyone make out the middle east?
ALSO: Not all Neutrals have unit values? Are these just easy walk-overs? With no IPC value (possible strategic value)?
-
we all know that Brazil is pro-allied, but the territory above the Arabian peninsula appears to be pro-axis as for the rest, they seem to be true neutrals
as for the neutrals without unit values, the ones like that in the pacific could just be taken, I see no reason why Europe would be different
-
So Far we have confirmed the following:
Pro-Allied
Greece
Brazil
YugoslaviaPro-Axis
Finland
Bulgaria
IraqTrue Neutral
Sweden
Spain
Portugal
Switzerland
(The remainder of S.America)
(The remainder of Africa)
MongoliaCorrect?
-
Turkey - True Neutral
-
Iran is pro ally