Thanks Panther that is what I thought.
US captures Canadian territories
-
@Imperious:
no not you guys. You post more than one sentence and though often you’re off topic at least its not a post like this:
“agreed”
“I just still think its good”
" I just want to know that its possible"
“I am not sure what i think of that,so what do you think”
…… none of this leads to conversation on these boards…
Actually I think that the above four examples are perfectly normal “conversation” and one should be surprised if they didn’t appear in a forum. It is after all an exchange between people and social conventions demand responses even when there’s no new information to add. Not saying it makes for stellar reading but I don’t think the above four examples are dysfunctional, ignorant or odd. Especially in the absence of any system of voting support for a person’s position or disagreement.
Furthermore, not every posting can be a lengthy diatribe with wiki quotes, links, house rules etc.
Nor should it be.
How a lengthier message to express the same sentiments listed above would be superior is beyond me. You’d think that being succinct enough to express yourself in a single line would be applauded rather than jeered at.Anyway, IMTO (since someone should get back on topic), I hope that the American capture of Canadian territory in the above Pacific scenario will not be maintained in the Global version where there’s London in play. (I know that’s only a single sentence but… do you want me to stutter?)
#566
-
India will still control yukon and BC.
What does IMTO stand for? In my _________ opinion? What fills the blank?
-
India will still control yukon and BC.
While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?
#568
-
India will still control yukon and BC.
While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?
#568
yes, but Calvin said it would just make everything more complicated, in a complicated game.
-
What does IMTO stand for? In my _________ opinion? What fills the blank?
Temporary.
My opinion seems to be granted a limited life span in these fora. Read fast.
-
@Dylan:
India will still control yukon and BC.
While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?
#568
yes, but Calvin said it would just make everything more complicated, in a complicated game.
And yet the Canadian roundels seem to have been added to the map to facilitate just such a degree of complication.
#570
-
LOL, since Calvin has asked this like 9 trillion times:
iMTO means In My Truthful Opinion, at least I’m pretty sure it does. If it doesn’t then…shrug
While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?
I’m pretty sure it won’t be in AA1940…
-
@UN:
iMTO means In My Truthful Opinion, at least I’m pretty sure it does. If it doesn’t then…shrug
Can’t say I’ve ever thought of that.
#573
-
this topic is all wrong its 1)USA get captured by japan
2)CANADA liberates USADon’t be stupid.
-
@Dylan:
India will still control yukon and BC.
While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?
#568
yes, but Calvin said it would just make everything more complicated, in a complicated game.
And yet the Canadian roundels seem to have been added to the map to facilitate just such a degree of complication.
#570
It is simple, Canadian roundels = UK roundels. The Canadian roundels are just for aesthetics - Larry said so.
-
The Canadian roundels are just for aesthetics - Larry said so.
Went thru the Global facts thread and I can’t see him saying that they’re only there for looks.
#725
Suggested Topics
