• Actually we can check your sock puppetery ( if its true or false) by comparing IP addresses.


  • no not you guys. You post more than one sentence and though often you’re off topic at least its not a post like this:

    “agreed”

    “I just still think its good”

    " I just want to know that its possible"

    “I am not sure what i think of that,so what do you think”

    or

    Hay! wass that me or your glorius british mamma and her nice plastic bits ( J/K) hahahahah  :| :wink: :evil: :roll: :cry: :oops: waaaa!!

    none of this leads to conversation on these boards…


  • @Imperious:

    no not you guys. You post more than one sentence and though often you’re off topic at least its not a post like this:

    “agreed”

    “I just still think its good”

    " I just want to know that its possible"

    “I am not sure what i think of that,so what do you think”

    or

    Hay! wass that me or your glorius british mamma and her nice plastic bits ( J/K) hahahahah  :| :wink: :evil: :roll: :cry: :oops: waaaa!!

    none of this leads to conversation on these boards…

    Your a Cyber Bully. I really don’t think that is right.


  • @Imperious:

    no not you guys. You post more than one sentence and though often you’re off topic at least its not a post like this:

    “agreed”

    “I just still think its good”

    " I just want to know that its possible"

    “I am not sure what i think of that,so what do you think”

    …… none of this leads to conversation on these boards…

    Actually I think that the above four examples are perfectly normal “conversation” and one should be surprised if they didn’t appear in a forum.  It is after all an exchange between people and social conventions demand responses even when there’s no new information to add. Not saying it makes for stellar reading but I don’t think the above four examples are dysfunctional, ignorant or odd. Especially in the absence of any system of voting support for a person’s position or disagreement.

    Furthermore, not every posting can be a lengthy diatribe with wiki quotes, links, house rules etc.
    Nor should it be.
    How a lengthier message to express the same sentiments listed above would be superior is beyond me.  You’d think that being succinct enough to express yourself in a single line would be applauded rather than jeered at.

    Anyway, IMTO (since someone should get back on topic), I hope that the American capture of Canadian territory in the above Pacific scenario will not be maintained in the Global version where there’s London in play.  (I know that’s only a single sentence but… do you want me to stutter?)

    #566


  • India will still control yukon and BC.

    What does IMTO stand for? In my _________ opinion? What fills the blank?


  • @calvinhobbesliker:

    India will still control yukon and BC.

    While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?

    #568


  • @allboxcars:

    @calvinhobbesliker:

    India will still control yukon and BC.

    While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?

    #568

    yes, but Calvin said it would just make everything more complicated, in a complicated game.


  • @calvinhobbesliker:

    What does IMTO stand for? In my _________ opinion? What fills the blank?

    Temporary.

    My opinion seems to be granted a limited life span in these fora. Read fast.


  • @Dylan:

    @allboxcars:

    @calvinhobbesliker:

    India will still control yukon and BC.

    While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?

    #568

    yes, but Calvin said it would just make everything more complicated, in a complicated game.

    And yet the Canadian roundels seem to have been added to the map to facilitate just such a degree of complication.

    #570


  • LOL, since Calvin has asked this like 9 trillion times:

    iMTO means In My Truthful Opinion, at least I’m pretty sure it does. If it doesn’t then…shrug

    While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?

    I’m pretty sure it won’t be in AA1940…


  • @UN:

    iMTO means In My Truthful Opinion, at least I’m pretty sure it does. If it doesn’t then…shrug

    Can’t say I’ve ever thought of that.

    #573


  • @cminke:

    this topic is all wrong its 1)USA get captured by japan
                                     2)CANADA liberates USA

    Don’t be stupid.


  • @allboxcars:

    @Dylan:

    @allboxcars:

    @calvinhobbesliker:

    India will still control yukon and BC.

    While I can see the logic in Pacific, that seems ahistorical and mildly ridiculous for the Global game, doesn’t it?

    #568

    yes, but Calvin said it would just make everything more complicated, in a complicated game.

    And yet the Canadian roundels seem to have been added to the map to facilitate just such a degree of complication.

    #570

    It is simple, Canadian roundels = UK roundels. The Canadian roundels are just for aesthetics - Larry said so.


  • @Wilson2:

    The Canadian roundels are just for aesthetics - Larry said so.

    Went thru the Global facts thread and I can’t see him saying that they’re only there for looks.

    #725

Suggested Topics

Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

34

Online

17.7k

Users

40.4k

Topics

1.8m

Posts