Naval screening question…

[Hobbes]

@Praetorian:

@Razor:

Your fleet might combat-move out of a hostile seazone, but are not allowed to embark any tranny there.

There it is - we played it wrong.  p12 in the rules.  Thanks.

On that situation there’s an exception to the rules, according to the official FAQ:

“Important exception – During the combat movement phase following the announced declaration of war, transports already in sea zones that have just become hostile may be loaded in those sea zones (but not in other hostile sea zones). This may occur only during the first Combat Move phase following the announced declaration of war. Once that initial combat movement phase is over, normal transport loading restrictions apply.”

[Razor]

@Hobbes:

On that situation there’s an exception to the rules, according to the official FAQ:

If it aint in the Rulebook, it is a houserule.

And all houserules are optional.

You got a weak case if it was in a court.

[The Fire Knight]

@Razor:

@Hobbes:

On that situation there’s an exception to the rules, according to the official FAQ:

If it aint in the Rulebook, it is a houserule.

And all houserules are optional.

You got a weak case if it was in a court.

The Rulebook is wrong, and that has been officially confirmed by the people who made the game. It’s not a house rule. It’s a rule.

[Hobbes]

@Razor:

@Hobbes:

On that situation there’s an exception to the rules, according to the official FAQ:

If it aint in the Rulebook, it is a houserule.

And all houserules are optional.

You got a weak case if it was in a court.

But we’re not in a court and you’re free to say your interpretation of the rules the same way I’m free to inform people of the Official FAQ.  :-)

[Dougler88]

@Razor:

@Hobbes:

On that situation there’s an exception to the rules, according to the official FAQ:

If it aint in the Rulebook, it is a houserule.

And all houserules are optional.

You got a weak case if it was in a court.

Actually, if this was a court the rulebook would be something similar to a written constitution. And in that regard there are interpretations that aren’t officially recorded in said written constitution, but carry the weight as if it does. So the official errata would stand as rules unwritten.

[WILD BILL]

I agree, Razor if your not using the now official errata you are cheating!!!

Of course you probably only play against Aldertag, so your only cheating your other self. :-D

[thenorthman]

@Razor:

@Hobbes:

On that situation there’s an exception to the rules, according to the official FAQ:

If it aint in the Rulebook, it is a houserule.

And all houserules are optional.

You got a weak case if it was in a court.

LOL

[Razor]

@WILD:

I agree, Razor if your not using the now official errata you are cheating!!!

Yes but the errata is a mile long and get re-writen every day. The real problem is that WOTC are incompetent. They dont care about A&A.

Yes I use to cheat when I play against my evil twin Adlertag. But I would like to some day join  Tournament play and then we need official rules that everybody play by. WOTC need to understand this issue and print new rulebooks that are distributed to all customers for any reason ASAP.

[Razor]

@thenorthman:

LOL

I spend $100 to buy this game, you dont see me laughing, buddy.

[Krieghund]

@Dougler88:

@Razor:

@Hobbes:

On that situation there’s an exception to the rules, according to the official FAQ:

If it aint in the Rulebook, it is a houserule.

And all houserules are optional.

You got a weak case if it was in a court.

Actually, if this was a court the rulebook would be something similar to a written constitution. And in that regard there are interpretations that aren’t officially recorded in said written constitution, but carry the weight as if it does. So the official errata would stand as rules unwritten.

Using this model, I would think that the errata would be amendments to the constitution, not unwritten rules.

[thenorthman]

@Razor:

@thenorthman:

LOL

I spend $100 to buy this game, you dont see me laughing, buddy.

I am laughing at you.

Plus why did you spend $100.  I got mine for $60.  LOL

Plus you actually act like your the age where some one else would of bought the game for you.

Sean