Well one time when I was 18 I had broken my leg so I had a cast from my ankle to half way up my thigh. My buddy was riding me double on his bicycle downhill on Niagara St. We past a cruiser who pulled a U-turn. My bud was nimble on the bike and by the time the cruiser had down his 180, my friend road us between Time Square and the canal in the rear parking lot. We squeezed between two buildings, left the bike in tall grass and the cruiser slowly drove past us, missed us hiding in debris and left us alone. Not bad on one leg if I do say so myself! Riding double on a bicycle with a broken leg…not sure why we were so scared of the heat! Oh yeah, no headlight on the bicycle…
Antarctic ozone hole biggest ever RECORDED…
-
Both of 'em are fools! :)
-
speak for me again falk, and ill cut you :wink:
-
@F_alk:
How has the number of polluters evolved?
Even if each single polluter spits out only half the dirt, a doubled number makes that up.Actualy I read in the paper that the population of California has decreased in the last year.
I don’t know if that is in LA or not though.
speak for me again falk, and ill cut you
LMAO
-
@F_alk:
How has the number of polluters evolved?
Even if each single polluter spits out only half the dirt, a doubled number makes that up.Actualy I read in the paper that the population of California has decreased in the last year.
But, has the number of cars? etc. etc.
And of course, the economic “breakdown” just happened, its effects probably will show up in the next (or later) years statistics.And Janus: That just had to be ;) :)?
-
@F_alk:
@F_alk:
How has the number of polluters evolved?
Even if each single polluter spits out only half the dirt, a doubled number makes that up.Actualy I read in the paper that the population of California has decreased in the last year.
But, has the number of cars? etc. etc.
And of course, the economic “breakdown” just happened, its effects probably will show up in the next (or later) years statistics.Well, in the car example, if there’s less people, there should theoretically be less cars being driven. Otherwise, it’s possible they could be polluting more.
-
@Grigoriy:
Well, in the car example, if there’s less people, there should theoretically be less cars being driven. Otherwise, it’s possible they could be polluting more.
Not really, that assumes that there is a “saturated” kind of situation.
Look at China: This is not saturated. Even the the population is now under control, more and more people wish to have and drive cars.But, surely we could assume that California has a very different situation, being closer to this “saturation”.
-
Last time, I checked there were 30+ million cars in California. But I think the population of California is ever-increasing – not decreasing.
-
@TG:
Last time, I checked there were 30+ million cars in California. But I think the population of California is ever-increasing – not decreasing.
And what is CA’s population? Also to take into account are the number of people of legal driving status.
-
according to the official CA state site 2001 Population count was:34,735,000
the closest tey know now is: 34,488,000…
Growing? yes
Mushrooming? I’m not sure…maybe it’s wrong stats…
-
Very well, approx 35 million people and 30 million cars, and given that not all people have need for a car and/or use a car, I would guess that the cars/people situation in CA is near saturation.
-
according to the official CA state site 2001 Population count was:34,735,000
the closest tey know now is: 34,488,000…
Growing? yes
Mushrooming? I’m not sure…That’s true, but if you count illegals, you can get anywhere up to 40 million.
Suggested Topics
