Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2)

[Imperious Leader]

@Krieghund well there you go…

[dazedwit]

@Krieghund

UK1 they land Rio de Oro turning all strict neutrals pro axis.

Can Russia take Afghanistan after and get $3 NO for taking a pro Axis neutral?

I feel like answer is yes and a new strategy will be in the works if so.

[TinCanoftheSea]

@dazedwit Page 25 “3 IPCs for each territory that the Soviet Union controls that was originally German, Italian, or pro-Axis neutral.” An interesting thought but it appears it would not work as Afghanistan was not originally pro axis

[matttodd1]

@Krieghund I’ve got a question relative to potential non combat movement, and the option to scramble.

If there is an Italian cruiser and battleship that starts in a SZ (say SZ98), and a transport comes from another SZ into SZ98, to make an amphibious assault on Egypt, and the cruiser and battleship specifically are not used to bombard, but simply remain in SZ98, in case UK opts to scramble (there is an airbase in Egypt), can the battleship and cruiser move during the noncombat movement phase if the UK opts not to scramble?

Thanks in advance!

[Krieghund]

@matttodd1 Yes, they can, as they neither moved in combat movement nor participated in combat.

[matttodd1]

@Krieghund thank you!

[The Farmer]

@Krieghund Can the Chinese Fighter land in the territory it conducted combat in if the combat was successful and the territory is Chinese?

[surfer]

@The-Farmer Nope. All fighters even the Chinese must land in territory that was friendly at the start of the turn.

[Krieghund]

@The-Farmer @surfer is correct.

[The Farmer]

@Krieghund @surfer Thanks