@SuperbattleshipYamato right but it only applies if stated specifically like it does in the rules for the original bonus. This version overrides the earlier bonus.
@Blackychan said in Oztea's 1939 Global Setup:
@barnee mine too but the group wanted @oztea to clarify just in case and I was saying they do.
I will message him on fb right now.
@crockett36 thank you:)
@Blackychan did it. welcome.
@oztea said in Oztea's 1939 Global Setup:
If the Soviets can attack Finland and win, its all theirs. So Germany might want to get there first.
Yes, the Soviets can attack pro-axis forces, or activate pro Allied territories before it is at war with the germans
I should have clarified this yes. Soviets can interact with neutrals before they are at war with Germany. And I should have clarified the Soviet national objective should say “When at war with Germany”.
Glad you guys are still interested in the setup! Been playing a lot of WWII in Europe and the Pacific instead of A&A.
@oztea Thank you for letting us know, me and my group have been religiously playing your version of axis and allies. I play with some people on Tripple A as well.
I post in the facebook group chat of the 1939 games as well :)
Thank you for clarifying!
@oztea I feel like there should be more dutch units.
@oztea If the allies attack the Dutch factions do all the strict neutrals become pro axis? I would assume so correct?
Hi @Blackychan
I can see why one would think that since that’s what happens when the Axis do it.
Idk the answer though. @crockett36 do you have any insight on this ?
Edit
My interpretation is since it doesn’t say they do, then they don’t.
@barnee I agree but then whats stopping anzac and calcutta from just taking the money islands turn one then?
Germany is going to get 6 IPCs for it and 4 guys? Compared to Anzac and Calcutta pressuring Japan on another front? At that point it becomes to heavily leaning into the allies since Japan already does not have the best backing in this one with having to force its way through calcutta and china from so far back.
Am I wrong in my thinking on this one?
@barnee I agree. At face value it is meant to deter the allies from grabbing the money islands early.
yea Idk. I haven’t looked at 39 in a while. I will need to fire it up and see whats up.
