@Brain:
Or how about the F-82 twin mustang for the US?
That shouldn’t exist….
Like it’s designed to send the Luftwaffe to eye-exams until their medical coverage collapses.
#452
I got more bad news. The rumour says Germany will only get 3 mech infantry.
what ever….ha ha ha :lol: :lol: :lol:
I got more bad news. The rumour says Germany will only get 3 mech infantry.
That was in that Hitler joke video.
Still pretty funny though
What no Carro Armato?
thats really cheap…
@i:
yah at least FMG is here for us!! un like WotC
Are your parents going to buy you the FMG pieces?
@i:
yah at least FMG is here for us!! un like WotC
Whats FMG? They make Italian pieces that are comparable for A&A?
I think this sucks btw, the Italian armor is distinctive!
@i:
yah at least FMG is here for us!! un like WotC
Whats FMG? They make Italian pieces that are comparable for A&A?
I think this sucks btw, the Italian armor is distinctive!
Ok… I guess since no one else is fielding this one.
FMG is an acronym for Field Marshal Games - look to the right of your screen, they have some adverts posted here as they are the official sponsor of the site. And I believe you might be rash in your thinking, simply from the fact that you haven’t seen any of the samples said company will be producing. Their Italian armor is likewise distinctive, and far more detailed, and yes, of the appropriate scale for A&A. My suggestion is that you browse around this site, find out about things in general… and then perhaps say what’s on your mind.
Well said Viracocha. I couldn’t have said it better myself.
And I believe you might be rash in your thinking, simply from the fact that you haven’t seen any of the samples said company will be producing.
Actually when he said “this sucks btw” I took it that he meant WOTC’s decision not to produce an Italian tank sucks, not the Italian tank that FMG is producing.
I could be wrong tho…
#484
And I believe you might be rash in your thinking, simply from the fact that you haven’t seen any of the samples said company will be producing.
Actually when he said “this sucks btw” I took it that he meant WOTC’s decision not to produce an Italian tank sucks, not the Italian tank that FMG is producing.
I could be wrong tho…
#484
(chuckle) In retrospect, that may be the case… or it could mean Italian tanks in general are distinctive, or - couple different ways to take it. Well Ministry, my apologies if I misunderstood your post. Check out FMG’s excellent tanks and get back to us…
I’m really disappointed we don’t get dedicated sculpts for the regia marina. We got dedicated sculpts for the USSR, for god’s sake. Argh…
And let’s not forget the United Kingdom… who are still using U.S. subs and destroyers, uhh… didn’t the Royal British Navy play a bigger role in the war than the U.S.S.R.?
If there is anything the Russians should get distinctive its artillery. Russians were very skilled artillerymen and took great pride in the use of artillery. In lend-lease, they hardly ever, if at all, requested howitzers or any type of artillery from the Anglo nations throughout the war because artillery is one of the items they produce themselves in very large amounts. How cool would it be to have katyusha rocket artillery on the back of a studebaker for an artillery piece!
The only time the USSR requested artillery units from lend-lease was late in the war. They only requested 4 units. Obviously it was for inspection purposes to examine the western powers’ artillery capabilities.
Katyusha rockets would be too cool.
innaccurate. but cool
