@FranceNeedsMorePower Making the cruiser in 110 a BB wildly upsets the naval battle G1. While I respect the goal of powering up France, I stick with my previous comment about starting small. This move would take off at least 1 or 2 planes from Germany and likely preserve the Royal Navy elsewhere, causing later game shifts.
@Tamer-of-Beasts Your right. So to sum it up these are the changes for France.
French Fighter removed from London
1 UK Infantry has been added to France
1 Transport added to sea zone 105. (Maybe a Destroyer optional.)
2 Infantry added to Indochina along with a Destroyer in the sea zone next to it. Naval Base and And Airfield added as well.
And that’s all the changes right?
@FranceNeedsMorePower Pretty good. I’d leave the fighter in London though so it doesn’t mess up the naval battles the other way. Having the 3 fighter scramble is a valuable option. 2 simply wouldn’t cut it.
Looks good!
I do agree with Tamer of Beasts that we should keep the French fighter there, or at least change it to a British one.
I think not adding anything to North Africa is fine. French forces weren’t that strong.
@SuperbattleshipYamato We should keep it French because the Fighter can fly to a lot of places and that could represent the scattered Free French air forces.
Sure.
@SuperbattleshipYamato @Tamer-of-Beasts Go check my idea for battle of britain game.
@FranceNeedsMorePower Absolutely,do NOT add a AB+NB to FIC in the set -up.It would be a very generous gift to Japan.
@ampdrive Hmm. I see then just a naval base would be good. Although one of the main reasons Japan wanted Indochina was because of its airfields and shipyards. So maybe a airbase and a naval base with a infantry and artillery to defend. Indochina was known for its forts that is what the artillery represents.
That’s a better idea, especially since Japan is usually somewhat stretched to the limits on their declaration of war on the US.
