2011 Find League Opponents Here

[Joe Cold]

I’ll start the thread. Let me know about the tech thingy.

[dutchmand]

Alright Maxo… sent pm.

Going to have to get you a “1” in your little loss column there.

[cts17]

Looking for two games:
1 AA41 and 1 AA42. I prefer tech. Bidding for Allies, I’ll take them for 7 IPC in either version

[dutchmand]

I’m in Cts17.

[Battlingmaxo]

@DutchmanD:

Alright Maxo… sent pm.

Going to have to get you a “1” in your little loss column there.

I thought that might get your attention.  Btw, that’s against 10 different players…no pigeons

[hobo]

I guess I got time for another 41 three game series, preferably with someone I haven’t played yet.

[Botider]

PM for game… state preferences for sides, techs, NOs, bids…

[Panther]

I’m in for the 2010 AA50-41-league, now.

I’m loking for an opponent to play a three game series. Having played 6 games in the 2009 AA50-41 league I am not experienced enough to profit from the much discussed possible Axis dominance. To me it’s hard to win with either side. ;-)

So I would like to play with a bid of “0”.
To make the outcome of the series “balanced” I suggest to play the following way:

Game 1: Rolling for sides, 0 bid, NO +, Tech -
Game 2: Playing the opposite sides, 0 bid, NO +, Tech -
Game 3: when 1:1 rolling for sides, 0 bid, NO +, Tech +
when 2:0 player who lost chooses side, chooses Tech yes/no, NO +

I’m open for other suggestions of course. ABattlemap with compatible modules only, please
(see http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=12873.msg357193#msg357193 ).

Please PM me if you are interested.

[Panther]

Rolling for sides for the first game hobo vs. P@nther:

1,3,5 hobo is Axis
2,4,6 P@nther is Axis

Rolling 1d6:
(1)

[Bardoly]

After not playing any Axis and Allies games for the last 3 months, I’m finally ready to get into the '41 2010 League, although I may only be able to post about 4 moves per game per week.

So, what I’m looking for is a 3-game series with 1 opponent, with the first 2 to be played either simultaneously or back-to-back (both are okay) with each player playing both the Axis and the Allies.  The third game to be started later.

I want to play with tech in all 3 games, but if I can’t get a tech opponent, then it’s negotiable.

I’m still out on a limb about the (supposed) Axis advantage in the '41 setup, but I don’t think that bid units to Europe/Africa helps game balance.  I think what I would rather do is have a 3 IPC Allied bid of 1 infantry unit to Asia.  As a gentleman’s agreement, the posssible locations for the 1 infantry are as follows:

1)  1 Chinese infantry to any 1 of the 7 starting Chinese-controlled territories.
2)  1 UK infantry to Persia, India, Burma, Kwangtung, or Australia.
3)  1 Russian infantry to Novosibirsk, Urals, Evenki, Yakut, Stanovoj, Far East, or Buryatia.
4)  1 US infantry to the Philippines, Wake, Midway, Hawaii, Alaska, or West US

If someone is interested in these terms, then please post a reply in this thread and PM me.

[souL]

Looking to pick up 1-2 more games.  1941, blind bid, tech I could go either way, but I prefer no.

[cts17]

@Bardoly:

After not playing any Axis and Allies games for the last 3 months, I’m finally ready to get into the '41 2010 League, although I may only be able to post about 4 moves per game per week.

So, what I’m looking for is a 3-game series with 1 opponent, with the first 2 to be played either simultaneously or back-to-back (both are okay) with each player playing both the Axis and the Allies.  The third game to be started later.

I want to play with tech in all 3 games, but if I can’t get a tech opponent, then it’s negotiable.

I’m still out on a limb about the (supposed) Axis advantage in the '41 setup, but I don’t think that bid units to Europe/Africa helps game balance.  I think what I would rather do is have a 3 IPC Allied bid of 1 infantry unit to Asia.  As a gentleman’s agreement, the posssible locations for the 1 infantry are as follows:

1)  1 Chinese infantry to any 1 of the 7 starting Chinese-controlled territories.
2)  1 UK infantry to Persia, India, Burma, Kwangtung, or Australia.
3)  1 Russian infantry to Novosibirsk, Urals, Evenki, Yakut, Stanovoj, Far East, or Buryatia.
4)  1 US infantry to the Philippines, Wake, Midway, Hawaii, Alaska, or West US

If someone is interested in these terms, then please post a reply in this thread and PM me.

I will play against you, the first two simualtaneously. (I want your Axis moves first  :-P)
It would be best to wait until after the weekend, as I won’t be able to post from Friday afternoon until Monday afternoon, but if you wish to start immediately, then by all means!

[Bardoly]

@cts17:

@Bardoly:

After not playing any Axis and Allies games for the last 3 months, I’m finally ready to get into the '41 2010 League, although I may only be able to post about 4 moves per game per week.

So, what I’m looking for is a 3-game series with 1 opponent, with the first 2 to be played either simultaneously or back-to-back (both are okay) with each player playing both the Axis and the Allies.  The third game to be started later.

I want to play with tech in all 3 games, but if I can’t get a tech opponent, then it’s negotiable.

I’m still out on a limb about the (supposed) Axis advantage in the '41 setup, but I don’t think that bid units to Europe/Africa helps game balance.  I think what I would rather do is have a 3 IPC Allied bid of 1 infantry unit to Asia.  As a gentleman’s agreement, the posssible locations for the 1 infantry are as follows:

1)  1 Chinese infantry to any 1 of the 7 starting Chinese-controlled territories.
2)  1 UK infantry to Persia, India, Burma, Kwangtung, or Australia.
3)  1 Russian infantry to Novosibirsk, Urals, Evenki, Yakut, Stanovoj, Far East, or Buryatia.
4)  1 US infantry to the Philippines, Wake, Midway, Hawaii, Alaska, or West US

If someone is interested in these terms, then please post a reply in this thread and PM me.

I will play against you, the first two simualtaneously. (I want your Axis moves first  :-P)
It would be best to wait until after the weekend, as I won’t be able to post from Friday afternoon until Monday afternoon, but if you wish to start immediately, then by all means!

Sounds good.  I’ll PM you.

[akreider2]

I’m looking for a game. 1941.  Bid for Allies.

[Gornsdorf]

I’m in for AA50-41.  PM me I guess?  Ready and waiting…

[Funcioneta]

Looking for a game. 1942 scenario, tech, blind bid (daak or frood, I don’t mind)

[TimTheEnchanter]

it’s hard to tell who’s still looking for games, so I’ll post a general request:

aa50-1941 - bid for allies (frood?), I can go either way on tech.

PM me or reply here.

[TimTheEnchanter]

Rolling sides of a 2 sided die (a.k.a. a coin) for first of a series between hobo and myself.

1= hobo Axis
2= Tim Axis

Rolling 1d2:
(2)

[Bardoly]

I have one 3-game series going on with cts17, but I’m looking for another one or two as follows:

A 1941 setup with NO’s and tech 3-game series with 1 opponent, with the first 2 games to be played either simultaneously or back-to-back (either is okay) with each player playing both the Axis and the Allies.  If back-to-back, then roll to see who is the Axis first.  The third game to be started later with these stipulations:  If one player lost both of the first 2 games, then he may choose his side for game 3.  If the games are split, then mutually agree or roll for sides for game 3.

I want to play with tech in all 3 games, but if I can’t get a tech opponent, then it’s negotiable.

I’m still out on a limb about the (supposed) Axis advantage in the '41 setup, but I don’t think that bid units to Europe/Africa helps game balance.  I think what I would rather do is have a 3 IPC Allied bid of 1 infantry unit to Asia.  As a gentleman’s agreement, the posssible locations for the 1 infantry are as follows:

1)  1 Chinese infantry to any 1 of the 7 starting Chinese-controlled territories.
2)  1 UK infantry to Persia, India, Burma, or Australia.
3)  1 Russian infantry to Novosibirsk, Urals, Evenki, Yakut, Stanovoj, Far East, or Buryatia.

I should be able to post moves about 4-5 times per week per game.  If someone is interested in these terms, then please post a reply in this thread and PM me.  I’m willing to take on up to two more opponents in this way.

[Bardoly]

@Bardoly:

I have one 3-game series going on with cts17, but I’m looking for another one or two as follows:

A 1941 setup with NO’s and tech 3-game series with 1 opponent, with the first 2 games to be played either simultaneously or back-to-back (either is okay) with each player playing both the Axis and the Allies.  If back-to-back, then roll to see who is the Axis first.  The third game to be started later with these stipulations:  If one player lost both of the first 2 games, then he may choose his side for game 3.  If the games are split, then mutually agree or roll for sides for game 3.

I want to play with tech in all 3 games, but if I can’t get a tech opponent, then it’s negotiable.

I’m still out on a limb about the (supposed) Axis advantage in the '41 setup, but I don’t think that bid units to Europe/Africa helps game balance.  I think what I would rather do is have a 3 IPC Allied bid of 1 infantry unit to Asia.  As a gentleman’s agreement, the posssible locations for the 1 infantry are as follows:

1)  1 Chinese infantry to any 1 of the 7 starting Chinese-controlled territories.
2)  1 UK infantry to Persia, India, Burma, or Australia.
3)  1 Russian infantry to Novosibirsk, Urals, Evenki, Yakut, Stanovoj, Far East, or Buryatia.

I should be able to post moves about 4-5 times per week per game.  If someone is interested in these terms, then please post a reply in this thread and PM me.  I’m willing to take on up to two more opponents in this way.

I forgot to mention that I’m willing to play with a 0 bid with the 3-game series stipulation if the 1 infantry Asia bid is not acceptable.