I don’t have AAP 1940 SE, but I’ve been looking at the pdf of the SE edition to see what changed from the first. Looking at the AAP SE changes vs. Global SE I notice the UK Pacific starting income is 16 rather than 17 for Global. This is due to the transfer of West India’s income to the Pacific and the North American UK territories are part of the European UK. (You probably already have this correctly entered for your map, but it is worth noting for those who are trying to reconstruct AAP 1940 SE using a first edition box and the Europe Global SE rules/box.)
Revised AA Pacific 1940 Battleboard
-
Hey, had some time as it snowed here in Maryland; 17 inches so far!!!
Check out this battleboard, not as perfect as it could be, but I believe it is quite usable!!
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/627152/axis-allies-pacific-1940-edition?size=large
Hope there are no mistakes! Let me know!!!
-
can mot inf be supported?
-
Aircraft Carriers have no attack capability? Sorry don’t have game yet.
-
A/C per se have no attack capability, only thru it’s carried planes.
They do defend at 2 however.
The enhanced attack combinations of all kinds do not appear on the battle board:
art/inf, tank/tac bomber and fighter/tac bomber.
-
Nice work!
+1 to you.
Would you please change ‘bomber’ to ‘tach bomber’ or ‘tactical bomber’ in the #3 zone?
-
Nice work!
+1 to you.
Would you please change ‘bomber’ to ‘tach bomber’ or ‘tactical bomber’ in the #3 zone?
That might clutter it up and I think the icon speaks for itself. IMHO of course.
-
@Brain:
Nice work!
+1 to you.
Would you please change ‘bomber’ to ‘tach bomber’ or ‘tactical bomber’ in the #3 zone?
That might clutter it up and I think the icon speaks for itself. IMHO of course.
Maybe if the Tac Bomber looked like the allies Tach bomber with 2 engines, the icon would be fine…but the Tac Bomber icon and the Fighter icon look similar to me.
-
@Brain:
Nice work!
+1 to you.
Would you please change ‘bomber’ to ‘tach bomber’ or ‘tactical bomber’ in the #3 zone?
That might clutter it up and I think the icon speaks for itself. IMHO of course.
Maybe if the Tac Bomber looked like the allies Tach bomber with 2 engines, the icon would be fine…but the Tac Bomber icon and the Fighter icon look similar to me.
But there should be no mistaking the fighter for the tactical bomber because of the text.
-
Great work, Constantinople, + to you :-)
-
@Brain:
@Brain:
Nice work!
+1 to you.
Would you please change ‘bomber’ to ‘tach bomber’ or ‘tactical bomber’ in the #3 zone?
That might clutter it up and I think the icon speaks for itself. IMHO of course.
Maybe if the Tac Bomber looked like the allies Tach bomber with 2 engines, the icon would be fine…but the Tac Bomber icon and the Fighter icon look similar to me.
But there should be no mistaking the fighter for the tactical bomber because of the text.
True that!
Suggested Topics
