@pacifiersboard scramble to 114?
2022 BM Playoff R2 Me1945 v Gamerman01 (+24)
-
@me1945 said in 2022 BM Playoff R2 Me1945 v Gamerman01 (+24):
P.S.I think I replied. 10-4 means ok on the police code.
Oh! I was not clear enough. Absolutely, you replied. Sometimes I don’t get notifications for replies on my threads, so was just saying I didn’t know you replied, for awhile. UK 3 below.
-
-
Comin’ right up
-
I think I should have made Germany come after the destroyer in 98.
Didn’t want you to rebuild that bomber, one of the most important pieces on the board. -
-
-
@gamerman01
Yep, your DD in the mediterranean was a pain. -
Oh, right, now I remember what happened to your bomber
-
I’m close, but getting too tired to pull the trigger. Even with all that poor luck you had, and even though you’re sending a little West, my Russians are struggling to slow the advance a single turn.
I think I have it, but need to sleep on it.
I think it involves leaving a stack out that’s too big for the Italians… Brilliant buy, that bomber. -
@gamerman01 said in 2022 BM Playoff R2 Me1945 v Gamerman01 (+24):
CRUNCH time with my work. 6/30 deadline for a type of job that I haven’t done in more than 12 years. July will be better for my gaming needs.
OK, 6/30 ended up being a triple deadline. All done 6/29, so I’m feelin’ good now!
I remember the options I ruled out last time, 9 days ago, so aiming to complete R4 now
-
R4 attached
I apologize for the break. I hope it’s not too much trouble to get re-oriented. And thank you for your patience and understanding, much appreciated
-
Hey fellas,
long time no see:-)
Just wondering, is the post turn via tripleA client feature including showing turn histories in the posts gone for good?
-
Just realized Gamer bought 3 Carriers with the US in the first 2 turns. Feels like a novelty as Gamer taught me to not overbuy carriers as they cannot fight and to leverage islands as carriers as good as possible^^
-
@jdow its not, but to put it in you either need to use the prerelease or copy paste it manually.
-
Hi, JDOW, what a welcome surprise!
Something happened with version 2.5.222594, to some of us, and the summary doesn’t work. 2.6 whatever (there are various) that aren’t official yet, it does. And they made some nice little improvements like it actually keeps track of which ground are amphibious or not, but the battle calculator doesn’t pull in the units it’s supposed to (for me at least).
So… Me1945 and I discussed it and went with the .5
-
What a smack in the mouth, you pop back in and call me out for hypocrisy! :fearful:
It was a nice break for a while, here. Without you or Bold, nobody has been poking me.
A guy can adjust his strategy a little over the years, right?(You are most welcome to comment as long as it doesn’t interfere with Me1945’s zen, don’t get me wrong)
<cough> I bought only 2 in the Pacific theater, though. The carrier buy US1 in the Atlantic is especially when I scramble G1 because Carrier can go out to sea with 2 planes US2 and that is the only way you can get fighters to London or Scotland US3 (crazy JDOW1’s excepted). I don’t know if anyone else ever takes advantage of the little 102 while USA is neutral rule :sunglasses: - I take some pride in that one.
I also like to think no one goes as light in the Pacific with carriers as I do but of course I can’t know that for sure either. :thinking_face:
-
@farmboy said in 2022 BM Playoff R2 Me1945 v Gamerman01 (+24):
use the prerelease or copy paste it manually.
Oh. Never thought of that, cool.
-
Oh, that’s right!
Me1945 did J3, so with only 3 production capacity at California, you tend to buy more expensive boats, so that is a factor, too <cough again>
-
@gamerman01
NP. Thanks for coming back with the turn. I would need a couple days with my turn. -
@JDOW said in 2022 BM Playoff R2 Me1945 v Gamerman01 (+24):
Just realized Gamer bought 3 Carriers with the US in the first 2 turns. Feels like a novelty as Gamer taught me to not overbuy carriers as they cannot fight and to leverage islands as carriers as good as possible^^
Nice to see you here.
Suggested Topics
