scramble all 3 planes to 115
TGC (CP) v Yamato (Entente), 1914, oob with RR
-
I know that you don’t have to attack in contested territories. Yeah, I forgot to edit it out. I’m indifferent now though considering that infantry got a hit regardless.
-
Cool. Hopefully you can tell me about that “non-intuitive nature” after we’re done (or maybe now if you’ll like).
-
By the way, who are the grandmasters of this game? What about other Axis and Allies games?
-
I forgot to edit the Italian infantry out of Belgian Congo. I edited it back in noncombat move.
I also used edit mode to spend more IPCs as America than I intended (I have 8 IPCs of savings, of which I used 7).
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in TGC (CP) v Yamato (Entente), 1914, oob with RR:
Cool. Hopefully you can tell me about that “non-intuitive nature” after we’re done (or maybe now if you’ll like).
Typing is terribly difficult to explain things but I do have a YouTube channel with (what I think) are helpful videos: Here’s a link to the intro video. The videos after the intro are strategy videos for each power and outline what I think are good plays for each side based on statistics and what each side trying to accomplish. Whatever is in the videos is exactly what I would try to type out here anyway. You certainly don’t have to watch them, I just mention them as a reason I likely won’t type out a response. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLmG_gyJQ_g
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in TGC (CP) v Yamato (Entente), 1914, oob with RR:
By the way, who are the grandmasters of this game? What about other Axis and Allies games?
There are none. I just used the term metaphorically to try to make the point that no matter how “imbalanced” a version of axis and allies is, I don’t think it holds a candle to experience. Take the most “imbalanced” version of axis and allies, put a newish player on the “winning” side and opposing him put a player who has over 100 games against 20+ different opponents on the same version. I feel strongly the experienced player wins that game every time.
-
Game History
Round: 7 Puchase Units - Germans Germans buy 2 artilleries and 14 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Germans 3 units repaired. Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Removing units owned by French from Kiel: 1 infantry EDIT: Removing units owned by Germans from Kiel: 1 infantry EDIT: Changing ownership of Kiel from French to Germans EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Changing unit hit damage for these Italians owned units to: tank = 1 EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode 1 infantry moved from Kiel to Ruhr 5 artilleries, 20 infantry and 3 tanks moved from Ruhr to Alsace 12 infantry moved from Switzerland to Piedmont 4 artilleries moved from Switzerland to Piedmont 2 artilleries moved from Switzerland to Alsace 2 fighters moved from Switzerland to Alsace 9 infantry moved from Hanover to Munich 1 artillery moved from Berlin to Kiel 2 fighters moved from Berlin to Hanover 3 infantry moved from Berlin to Kiel 1 infantry moved from Berlin to Silesia 9 infantry moved from Berlin to Hanover 2 infantry moved from Silesia to Galicia 2 infantry moved from Galicia to Ukraine 9 artilleries and 5 infantry moved from Ukraine to Sevastopol Germans take Sevastopol from Russians 1 fighter moved from Galicia to Ukraine 1 infantry moved from Tatarstan to Sevastopol 1 infantry moved from Angola to South West Africa Germans take South West Africa from British 1 infantry moved from Karelia to Finland Combat - Germans Battle in Piedmont Germans attack with 4 artilleries and 12 infantry Italians defend with 2 artilleries, 4 infantry and 1 tank Germans roll dice for 4 artilleries and 12 infantry in Piedmont, round 2 : 4/16 hits, 6.67 expected hits Italians roll dice for 2 artilleries, 4 infantry and 1 tank in Piedmont, round 2 : 1/7 hits, 3.17 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Germans, 1 artillery owned by the Italians and 3 infantry owned by the Italians lost in Piedmont Italians and Germans reach a stalemate . Battle score for attacker is 10 Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Casualties for Italians: 1 artillery and 3 infantry Battle in Alsace Germans attack with 7 artilleries, 2 fighters, 20 infantry and 3 tanks British defend with 3 infantry Germans roll dice for 7 artilleries, 2 fighters, 20 infantry and 3 tanks in Alsace, round 2 : 12/32 hits, 14.17 expected hits British roll dice for 3 infantry in Alsace, round 2 : 2/3 hits, 1.50 expected hits Units damaged: 2 tanks owned by the Germans 3 infantry owned by the British lost in Alsace Germans win, taking Alsace from British with 7 artilleries, 2 fighters, 20 infantry and 3 tanks remaining. Battle score for attacker is 9 Casualties for British: 3 infantry Combat Move - Germans Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Changing unit hit damage for these Germans owned units to: tank = 1 EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Place Units - Germans 2 artilleries and 14 infantry placed in Berlin Turn Complete - Germans Germans collect 54 PUs; end with 54 PUsCombat Hit Differential Summary :
Italians regular : -2.17 Germans regular : -4.83 British regular : 0.50 -
So what you’re saying is that while it might favour one side, it’s not terribly unbalanced. I’m not surprised, hundreds of hours were spent making the original rules to be balanced.
-
Thanks, I’ll look at the strategies. I’ll be able to hear your voice too.
-
-
I watched your intro video. Based on the number of wins, you’re probably very, very, very good. I’m now even more impressed than I was before.
-
Ohhhh, you’re so lucky! You have a full game, with all the pieces? Ahhhhh!
Sorry, I don’t have the actual game (I already ordered two from Renegrade), and it’s just so beautiful seeing it.
-
Nice pointer.
-
I started watching the Austria Hungary video. I see you did the exact same moves as you showed in the video.
A little question. How high of a win probability on a battle calculator do you recommend if you want to conquer a territory for 1914? Using AndrewAAGamer’s 95% or higher for other Axis and Allies games don’t really work due to how the battles work. What’s your recommendation? Thank you!
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in TGC (CP) v Yamato (Entente), 1914, oob with RR:
I started watching the Austria Hungary video. I see you did the exact same moves as you showed in the video.
A little question. How high of a win probability on a battle calculator do you recommend if you want to conquer a territory for 1914? Using AndrewAAGamer’s 95% or higher for other Axis and Allies games don’t really work due to how the battles work. What’s your recommendation? Thank you!
sending you a PM on this
-
My thoughts on the Russia video, which stood out to me:
Why do you have blockers in some territories, especially Ukraine when doing the Poland move? Most land units can only move one space, so if the Austro-Hungarians move into Ukraine they’ll just kill the infantry. if Ukraine was empty they wouldn’t be able to dash to Moscow anyway.
Wait, so in a Russian Revolution scenario no Allied powers can move into original Russian territories? If that’s the case, that means I’ve been playing the game wrong.
-
I think an important note is that in the game I was referring to (the Allies almost winning if not for some really bad decisions), the Central Powers built a big navy, so I guess I didn’t really see imbalance, but both bad luck and Central Powers stupidity (it was my first game of 1914).
To be honest, I can’t shake a personal urge as the Central Powers to build up a navy. Those ships just look so tempting to destroy…
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in TGC (CP) v Yamato (Entente), 1914, oob with RR:
I watched your intro video. Based on the number of wins, you’re probably very, very, very good. I’m now even more impressed than I was before.
Thanks but no, I really am no better or worse than someone who spends too much of his free time playing different versions on this game via Triple which allows anyone to be able to study the percentages and understand the pressure points on various maps.
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in TGC (CP) v Yamato (Entente), 1914, oob with RR:
So what you’re saying is that while it might favour one side, it’s not terribly unbalanced. I’m not surprised, hundreds of hours were spent making the original rules to be balanced.
Its difficult to explain thoroughly via text and I will eventually release a video on this concept but let me put it another way, if you and I played 10 games together, I know by the 10th game if you played the Entente, you would start regularly burying me as the CP and we would have to discuss how to balance the game.
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in TGC (CP) v Yamato (Entente), 1914, oob with RR:
I think an important note is that in the game I was referring to (the Allies almost winning if not for some really bad decisions), the Central Powers built a big navy, so I guess I didn’t really see imbalance, but both bad luck and Central Powers stupidity (it was my first game of 1914).
To be honest, I can’t shake a personal urge as the Central Powers to build up a navy. Those ships just look so tempting to destroy…
Whatever that urge is, don’t let anyone (even me) talk you out of trying it. The only way any of us learn anything or get better is ppl who have a new or untried idea. Only you should talk yourself out of it. Even if I don’t agree with it, I can say from personal experience, I’ve learned a lot from folks who had a unique strategy and in axis and allies the original, I myself was/am that guy. So if we end up swapping sides in the future, I will be keen to see what if any advantages can come from something like that.
Suggested Topics
