@andrewaagamer I definitely agree, I was horrible at playing the Axis but it just took a few games and some new strays to see the unbalance. And I too don’t like nerfing strat bombers because it seems to unbalance it more.
G40 vs AA50 discussion (from League players)
-
Ahhh, the veteran Karl is in lock step with me - we posted at the same time :blush:
Anyway, not arguing just to argue, just “hey”! Give it another shot?! But not the alcoholic type this time
-
'42 AA50 bids were miniscule. It was balanced. Sometimes a little bid one way, sometimes a little bid the other.
Again, there is no better A&A global game for tech.
-
@gamerman01 said in Post League Game Results Here:
I have 35 of my games of '41 scenario in my records (61 games of '42). Bids ranged from 6 to 19 (and most are under 15)
Eh, to be clear, those 96 games were all ones I played, not the community in general. So you could play a lot of games with a lot of people.
If you were losing, it was over quick. You get diced in G40 global game, you suffer for a very long time if you don’t resign.
Just sayin’! G40 isn’t the best at everything! :D :D
-
G gamerman01 referenced this topic on
-
@gamerman01 I bought Anniversary during a reprint a few years ago and quite enjoyed it. Fun on it’s own as a shorter play than Global it was also interesting to see the progression of ideas Larry Harris followed on his way from AA to Global.
-
Haven’t tried AA50, but G40 (read BM4 and P2V) simply is a gem.
-
@gamerman01 said in Post League Game Results Here:
@gamerman01 said in Post League Game Results Here:
I have 35 of my games of '41 scenario in my records (61 games of '42). Bids ranged from 6 to 19 (and most are under 15)
Eh, to be clear, those 96 games were all ones I played, not the community in general. So you could play a lot of games with a lot of people.
If you were losing, it was over quick. You get diced in G40 global game, you suffer for a very long time if you don’t resign.
Just sayin’! G40 isn’t the best at everything! :D :D
My G40 BM games are now at least 18-22 rounds if they are competitive. Once in awhile you get a rout that causes someone to throw in the towel first 5-10 rounds. But not usual. Even if Germany captures Russia, it isn’t over if Allies are in good position. Almost the start of the game really.
-
Perhaps you’d like to introduce me, @gamerman01?
-
Oh wow, it would be like playing a brand new game - exciting. I can’t get my kid to play more than 2 turns, as in, less than 1 round. I had started a game against the AI, rolled super subs for Germany for 5 IPCs, and never proceeded from there.
I do have 3 big G40 games going right now all against people who would love to beat me, so I probably need to wait. Remind me later?
-
I usually got my opponent to agree to +1 movement on long range aircraft. +2 in a serious game is overwhelming. I don’t like 1 turn delayed tech.
-
Also no island complexes (which I believe was first formally codified in G40)
-
I trust your judgement and experience. You choose settings. I’ll follow.
-
Just no LL. I despise LL.
-
G40 OOB is a bit too unbalanced in favour of Axis. It’s very hard to say what is a decent bet as it kind of ranges between 30-60 for the Allies. For me that is a weakness of the game.
BM4 is much better with a richer dynamic of play regarding NOs and balance. Bids range perhaps between 16-24 for the Allies.
P2V might still need some more love, but is pretty darn interesting. I’d say a reasonable bid there is 6-10 for Axis.
-
As my nephew (close to my age and former bitter rival in A&A) used to say (and I agree),
“Low luck is a bastardization of the game”.
(This is Boldfresh, still #8 top poster on this site)I’ve never even tried one turn of it because I can envision what it’s like.
Pretty sure I never played AA50 on TripleA. Was all ABattlemap back then. Type all your moves, move all the icons. It was fun.
-
@gamerman01 G40 has a lot of “dead” time it feels like. I’m somewhat surprised that league only has the 2 G40 variants and PtV and not 50th anniversary edition. There are a lot of turns in PBEM g40 where almost nothing happens (France/anzac, Italy, Russia after the fall of moscow) g40 is also just too long face to face since you have to roll a ton of dice turn G1/J1 and moving into the G1/J1 position F2F takes a while (you can agree to start off with G1/J1 already done but that is pretty hard to get people to agree to).
A&A 50 is much shorter in terms of time, but not in terms of rounds. The thing is it removes a lot of the dead turns that have little action, and the smaller map with higher IPC value territories makes it easier to finish the game. the main thing about A&A 50 is that I wish it had mech infantry, which is the unit that G40 added that has the best impact on gameplay. Though 5 cost tanks are basically better versions of Mech infantry+Tank anyway. The other change that G40 made that I wish were in was 12 cost MICs that make 3 units/turn. Instead of the 15 cost ICs that make territory value units/turn.
Though playing with NOs is more fun it definitely makes the game heavily axis favored.
-
@karl7 said in G40 vs AA50 discussion (from League players):
My G40 BM games are now at least 18-22 rounds if they are competitive. Once in awhile you get a rout that causes someone to throw in the towel first 5-10 rounds. But not usual. Even if Germany captures Russia, it isn’t over if Allies are in good position. Almost the start of the game really.
For a shorter game, try knocking out some NOs. An unfortunate side effect from BM.
-
@ussgordoncaptain Well said, thank you. Glad I moved this to general G40 discussion already
-
@gamerman01 said in G40 vs AA50 discussion (from League players):
Obviously, G40 is THE standout A&A game in many departments, but that time sink and the amount of RAM you need in your head is sometimes staggering.
I know what you mean here. The mental drain of playing a whole game in one sitting is very noticeable, even if it is <10 rounds.
-
I’ve only played games in competition, so probably a very different experience playing casually and maybe without <gasp> calculators?!
-
Hmm, never played Anniversary 50. Anyways, I’m surprised how common people seem to make bids are. I love Global 1940 because of how complicated and accurate it is, but it’s curious that Anniversary was almost a prototype for Global 1940, and is as close to an official Global 1941 or 1942 game with similar complexity.
Length isn’t a problem for me as I only play with members of my household, so we can play over weeks.
Too bad Anniversary 50 is very expensive.
-
P Panther forked this topic on
Suggested Topics
