• @Brain:

    What’s with the map?

    BD, oztea started this post with a Euro map, he has just updated it. It gives us some idea of what to expect as we get more details. I think its cool that he tweaks it along the way as he gets more feed back.

    Keep in mind that it is all speculation, I wonder when we will get a look at the actual Euro map. It probably won’t be til spring next year, a few months after the release of AA40P.


  • I wounder if you will be allowed movement on the northwestern coast of Africa. The Sahara goes to the coast in most AA games of recent, and is impassable. Would give new meaning to an IC in Brazil. You would be able to get troops into North Africa quicker w/ a safer route.


  • West Sahara must be Spanish (pro-axis neutral), maybe even with a shiny red and yellow roundel on it if you ask me … if you attack Franco or make him join the axis, it would be cool seeing how that front develops …


  • a few fixes

    europe 40 names and icons.JPG


  • Wow that map looks great, especially with the roundnels added it. My one criticism however is that the French and Italian roundnels are way too close in looks. Hopefully that will change so that they wouldn’t look so similar in the actual game.


  • i was going to draw a facies (spelling?) but i opted for what larry had used, even if its ahistorical


  • I understand your reasoning, but I hope Larry isn’t planning for the two roundnels to be so similar, especially with so many bordering territories of theirs. Its not like its a Japanese roundnel and an Italian one :-P


  • Well its not like italy and france are going to be taking that many territories!!!

    Hahaha! that is a joke you see!


  • Where are the convoy boxes?


  • It looks great. I like that america is broken up into more territories. Its a new change


  • I think i need to do IPCs before convoy boxes
    and I think larry said convoy boxes have changed, not a sea zone within a sea zone, just a sea zone that deprives IPCs to another, like the WHOLE seazone is linked to a land territory.

    We will see, but thats how I will be doing it


  • Sounds good. Can’t wait to see your IPC values


  • Yeah I’m excited to see how that turns out


  • I will be excited to see the real map some day as well


  • larry is keeping pretty tight lipped on this

    Atlantic 40 with Names, Markers, IPC, VC, Capitals, Factories.JPG


  • A map that keeps getting better and better. I saw it posted over on Larry’s forums as well; hope he likes it as much as we do!


  • I thought that there would be 6 territories between Berlin and Moscow???

    Also, I feel, as a Canadian, that Central Canada should be worth 3 IPC as well. I’m still really peeved with the introduction of ANZAC and Italy without the input of Canada. Ah well. Such is game balance.


  • Oh my, you made Sweden worth more then Norway. You better change that before Adlertag sees it.


  • there were serious discussions about invading norway, by the axis, allies, and soviets. Making it worth 4 makes it a little more enticeing.


  • Oz, I guess you meant Sweden instead of Norway.

    I still don’t think Sweden will be worth more then Norway. They should both be 3, and Finland at 2.  I don’t see Larry changing to much from what he used in AA50.

    I Know the iron ore in Sweden was a huge bonus to the axis, but they were handing it over to Germany anyway, so I don’t see why it should be worth so much. I could see it if they refused to trade with Hitler, but that wasn’t the case. Maybe tie all the Scandinavian countries to an NO or use convoy boxes to reflect the amount of trade that went on up there.

Suggested Topics

  • 5
  • 13
  • 15
  • 6
  • 2
  • 47
  • 32
  • 54
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

25

Online

17.8k

Users

40.5k

Topics

1.8m

Posts