L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V

[trulpen]

Japan is struggling a lot, but it’s still an interesting game. Germany have become a monster now after the glorious fall of Moscow.

[max334]

I had moved 2 ANZAC ftrs to Java. Not sure how we should handle that. And I’m not sure why, but I was totally oblivious to the threat you posed to Queensland.

[trulpen]

There were 2 aussie figs there.

[max334]

@trulpen Yes, like I said, I didnt see the threat. I had moved a US bomber to Queensland. I had moved 2 ANZAC ftrs to Java to defend against threat from battleship. We were skipping countries and it was missed

[max334]

Its not on the map you had to use

[trulpen]

I’m sorry there was an overlook, but in the concept of skipping a nation is the opportunity to look at that nation during a following nation’s turn.

ANZAC had not moved anything in several turns. Perhaps a fig to the US navy once.

If I’d skipped over Russia as well, which I was almost about to do (didn’t look at Queensland either, but Sibiria), then you’d not had a chance to look at Queensland.

Not seeing a threat is a mistake that happens all the time. I do it plenty myself.

What do you mean it was a map I didn’t use? I used the one after your russian turn.

[trulpen]

Ah, now I understand. You had moved 2 aussie figs to Java. Sorry, didn’t read that.

[trulpen]

It can be handled.

Of course, I might have considered to attack the unsupported des then, but it’s complicated.

[trulpen]

Would probably have gone in max in Queensland anyway, since it was essential to win that one.

[trulpen]

There were a bit of troubles when posting Russia, so perhaps that’s why?

[trulpen]

In the first battle round the 4 figs hit 2/4. I can roll for those and see if the 2 figs left hit or missed. Any miss would leave another inf for the next battle round, so would roll that @1.

In battle round 2 there were 3/4 hits and the method would be the same.

Only 2 fig left in battle round 3 and that would mean there actually were none, although they anyway hit 0/2. That one is perhaps a bit unfair. ;)

Maybe those two misses can count for one miss earlier sor something?

[max334]

@trulpen sounds fair. You can add back any units that would have survived given 2 less ftrs.

[trulpen]

Ok, I’ll do that. Think it’s fair that 2 figs less will count as one less hit (probability) on actual hits in round 1 and 2, still rolling for changed dice. Object if you oppose it. The changed dice would then be two rolls at 1/4 for round 1 and 2/4 for round 2.

[trulpen]

Not sure about the fig adjustment, but I’ll go with it for now. This way things will be easily adjustable. I will base these rolled dice on the position of actual dice, so for the first roll there will be a hit on 4 (and if you oppose that fig adjustment, it would also be a hit on 3).

[trulpen]

[dice 2d4]

[dicebot]

2d4: 2, 1

[trulpen]

Ok, in any case 2 misses.

I’ll roll 2d6@1 for round 2 because of 2 survived inf.

[trulpen]

[dice 2d6<=1]

[dicebot]

2d6<=1: 1, 2; Hits: 1

[trulpen]

One hit. Then I have to check for 1d6@2 as well on the defense.

Beginning with the air. Checking first which dice will be annulled.

[dice 1d3]