Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

KMT and CCP victory points. (V3)

Global War 1936

255

B

Broken Mortar
last edited by

The rules (3.3) say that you lose VPs per land zone in home territory that has a point value.

KMT/CCPs home territory consists of KMT, CCP, Warlords, Manchuria, Hong Kong, and Formosa.

So basically the Japanese really have to screw the pooch for KMT/CCP to get all their VPs.

Unless I’m missing something?
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

Featured Topics

League rules idea: mulligans for patrons

Guadalcanal Tournament at Strategicon (Los Angeles) Feb. 17, 2024

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

181

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

J

CCP "Spreading Influence" (V4)

Global War 1936
• • • Jan Aerts

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

610
Views

R

@jan-aerts hey Jan, you are limited by what the maximum influence value. That means in turn 1 you can only increase your influence roll by 1.
If you would control 3 territorries you could spend up to 3 IPP to increase your influence roll.
A

Shouldnt the CCP be named, "PRC" ("People's Republic of China") ??

Global War 1936
• • • All Encompassing Goose

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

427
Views

G

@all-encompassing-goose
No.
The CCP was established in 1921. The PRC wasn’t established until 1949. This game takes place before 1949.
H

Victory Points for Captured Objective Cities

Global War 1936
• • • HBG GW Enthusiast

10

0
Votes

10
Posts

913
Views

H

@generalhandgrenade Thanks and I appreciate your efforts on this extremely important issue!

Here’s the Errata General Hand Grenade is discussing:

Page 16, 3.2:
Replace: “Capturing an Objective City from an opposing player scores one Victory Point for each Objective City captured.”
With “Possessing an Objective City scores one Victory Point.”
V

Air Superiority Rules for GW 1936 v3

Global War 1936
• • • VonDox

8

0
Votes

8
Posts

858
Views

T

@insanehoshi True…
I forgot that.
H

German victory objective - Eliminate Communism; which Soviet cities...?

Global War 1936
• • • HMS Serapis

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

476
Views

G

Yes, it’s any 2 Soviet cities. Cities are only territories in the shape of a circle (or semi-circle on coastlines). We tried to remove all of the other city names from the V-2 map and replace them with regional names.

Murmansk does not have a circular territory and therefore is not considered a city territory. It exists in the territory of Kola. The only reference I’ve seen for those types of cities like Vladivostock and Murmansk is Red Cities in the Elite of the Soviet Union expansion set. I think they were probably put there for aesthetics.
B

GWv3 Burma Rd if Yunnan is CCP owned/controled

Global War 1936
• • • bradywh

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

912
Views

B

@Chris_Henry Very true
B

V3 Russian declaration of war.

Global War 1936
• • • Broken Mortar

14

0
Votes

14
Posts

1.3k
Views

G

No worries I agree with you that it’s better to know now than 6 months from now when everything is printed and distributed to the whole community. It’s a stressful time for the rules people trying to put the finishing touches on the game, especially with all that’s going on in the world around us. We all have lives outside of the game that have been disrupted and most of us have been quarantined in our homes but we are all doing our best. Thanks for helping us out not only with that but with all of the other helpful suggestions. I take everything I read from these forums plus comments on my channel and pass them along to help make it a better game. In the end it will be a game that was created with the help of the whole community. We can all take a bit of the credit for the end product.
R

V3 Submarine rules

Global War 1936
• • • RellHaiser

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

877
Views

R

@GeneralHandGrenade The end of your “Misunderstood Rules” video reminded me of this discussion.

Upon reflection, I think what I was really getting at with the way the beta rules are written is that they never explicitly state that surface warships other than Destroyers cannot attack submarines with the help of an aircraft on MAP. It is only implied that other ships cannot do this.

24

Online

17.9k

Users

40.6k

Topics

1.8m

Posts