b8292c8b-a6b6-4fea-907b-8168a552375d-42158-oob-tech-round-07-edit.tsvg
Tutor game: trulpen (X) vs Avner [and everyone else] (A+23) BM3
-
Another point I should make, which I believe I’ve already mentioned, is that we can now see the advantage of taking the northern route over Belarus. If the german stack had moved south in order to secure control over Ukraine and the factory, Russia would have a much easier task of stacking Bryansk. Now with the threat on Moscow, staying in Bryansk should be rather difficult.
If Russia decides to stack Smolensk with enough to be safe against the italian can-opener of 1 tank, 2 fig, 1 sb, then Germany can easily crush it with it’s full force and stack in Smolensk instead. As long as the stack is strong enough to hold against a counter-attack, of course.
This would delay claiming Bryansk for one turn, but atleast to a likely big cost for Russia, so it’s still a win-win.
-
Indeed, the passage from the north of the German mass is always a problem for the Russians … after studying Putin’s defensive plan … ehm, Stalin.
-
I think a screen on Smolensk… with a tank, a bomber and two Italian fighters is too expensive.
On the other hand, retreating to Moscow before consolidating with the Allied fleet in the English Channel is just as bad
And Italy is still strong in the Mediterranean …
Time for hard choices…
I think the counterattack in Ukraine should be risked
-
CM and NCM proposal…
-
I would define it like this …
-
finalized
-
Tough for Russia to lose a fig.
-
-
@surfer said in Tutor game: trulpen (X) vs Avner [and everyone else] (A+23) BM3:
@trulpen @Avner I would lose the tac vs. ftr. Need defense and prevent bombing.
I would also leave men 20ish in Tambov and nothing in Samara. We cover more territory that way.too late…
-
No problem. You can change it if you want to.
-
Suggested Topics
