L22 BM Me1945 (X) vs. farmboy (+22) rematch

[Me1945]

Subs in 62, 91 and 106 and art in Alexandria

[Me1945]

G1_Scramble.tsvg
HF & GL.
Scramble?

[farmboy]

@me1945 I’ll scramble 111. The sub will fight the first round in 106. If you get a hit before I do, I will lose the destroyer first, and the sub will submerge.

[Me1945]

G1.tsvg

[farmboy]

@me1945 R1.tsvg

[Me1945]

J1.tsvg

[Me1945]

btw, can you pls share updates about the league bid placement rules? A couple years ago the rules say the placement could be only made in the zones where the same power has a unit.

[farmboy]

@me1945 that is correct. I see though you put a uk sub down for me. I meant anzac. I will adjust.

[farmboy]

@farmboy I’m referring just to 62 of course.

[Me1945]

It is late . I accepted. No adj. pls.

[farmboy]

@me1945 ok. Fair enough. I should have looked at that more closely on Germany’s turn.

[Me1945]

To clarify, a bid placement rule break happens pretty often in the league. Particularly it pertains to NG. It is, however , an issue to discuss during the bidding process, nor when a game starts. So, I am good, no current or further complaints. Please proceed.

[farmboy]

@me1945 UK1.tsvg

[farmboy]

@me1945 I agree. I just want to clarify though that I asked for subs in 62, 91, and 106 but didn’t ask that a UK one would be put in 62. I assumed the flag would follow the rules and match the units already present. I don’t mind sticking with a UK one because I assume this might have effected your choices on Japan, and the point of that sub was to discourage the attack on 62 on a J1 so it doesn’t matter what flag it flies.

And I also don’t want to make an issue of it but just thought there might have been some miscommunication around the bid.

[Me1945]

I1.tsvg

[Me1945]

Hold on.

[Me1945]

I1_edit.tsvg

[Me1945]

Here we go

[farmboy]

@me1945 Fre-1.tsvg

[Me1945]

G2.tsvg