@Imperious:
why not start the game in July 1940
Then we could not get a french army.
Yah, well there is the real reason :-D. I agree, I have desired French infantry for sometime. But from a gameplay point of veiw July 1940 is a better starting point if the battle of France is too be scripted.
I understand what your saying that the Fall of France does not directly inluence Russia like the accualy negotiaious between Molotov and Ribbentrop. But these are just dipolmats and what ever there decide is a prodcut the military and political envirment, that being one where France has fallen and the Soveit are not getting the long Franco-German war they wished. I think it is reasonable to say that the Nazi’s succses caused the deterioration of Soveit-German ties. Once the pact was unnecsisary to protect Germany fronm a two front war(or so Hitler thought) the Germans began to get more agressive in there diplomacy and eventually invaded. In order to allow for balance in the game I think the logic must folloe that if Germany had wated any longer to build up for an invasion of the USSR, the USSR would have struck first or at least intensily increased there war readyness to a point where in A&A they can collect income and attack German peices.
If France and Germnay were in a long war, then the USSR would have little reason to increase its defence or attack Germany. Once France falls, it takes Russia three turns to realize what they must do. Its not complelely supportable, but with only two politcal forces(the allies and the axis) it should capture the feeling and timing and should allow for the game desginers to create a more dynamic Battle of France.