Well, I still like the Crusader, although I know it was more on the side of a light to medium tank. I’m not as familiar with the Cromwell, though I do know it was more comparible with the Sherman and other medium tanks.
The Churchill was heavy in terms of armor and size, but I thought the gun was somewhat underpowered. Now that I think about it, not really sure what caliber gun the Churchill had.
Perhaps HBG could make the Crusader in his British supplement set as a light tank, like his M-3 Stuart in the US set (those look great by the way).
What We Want the Next AA boardgame to be.
-
I vote fo rthe very beging of the war or immeditly after france falls so fall 1939 or summer 1940, alot was decided after those two points in the war that is missed even if you start in summer 1941
It would not be good to start the game between after poland is conquered and france falls, becasue france is just screwed even more.
I like having the whole world and not just europe and the pacific, it seems more complete and dynamic in that format.
-
North Africa really has to include the entire Mediterranean area.
-
cool map
-
I’m rather surprised at the support WWI and a Europe/Pacific combo game are getting. I guess we all have different concepts of ‘new.’
-
I’d be down with a WWI game as well. I’ve considered using the AAE map to make my own but haven’t spent the money for the Table Tactics pieces yet. Plus I would have to invest in some metal minis which just isn’t in the game budget right now. This would be a great opportunity for WOTC to make something new from something old ( a thing they seem to be good at ).
My second choice would be Stalingrad done like BOTB with a few new things thrown in.
-
I want to see one based on alternate history…see my post in the “other aaa variants” forum.
Barring that, WWI. It’s way cool.
-
You gotta love WW1. Just for the fact that you can “gas” the french and defeat them with chemical weapons in 1914-18 and fly 800 foot Zeppelins over UK and bomb the hell out of them is fascinating. IN this you got a decent German navy and better airforce and the real battle is in france rather than Russia.
Lastly the Turks are in it!
-
IMO I’m thinking the next AA Boardgame should have its own convoy concept similar to what the Theatre-level games employed so you can isolate overseas possessions and conduct interdict shipping with your subs.
I don’t think I’m the only one who was thinking that AAE and AAP was a step in a new direction with a number of features that would have some merit on a global scale… only to find them missing from AA50 and not holding my breath for AA42.
-
I have always liked the idea of Cold War gone Hot type game
It would take place in the 1980’s like Tom Clancy’s Red Storm Rising.
The US and UK would be on one side with The warsaw Pact on the Other
There would be special rules for the Europe, China and India joining, France surrendering.
And new peics too of modern weapons, like BMPs, T-80s, M1 Abrams, Apaches, F-16s, B-52s, TU-95s
aswell as nuclear subs and nuclear aircraft carriers.it would be awesome
o and of course tactical and stratigic nuclear missles
-
hey now, you put Bomba’s ol’ NATO, Nukes and Nazis and A&A mechanics together and you got my vote.
Crank up the Death Ray!! :evil:
-
hey now, you put Bomba’s ol’ NATO, Nukes and Nazis and A&A mechanics together and you got my vote.
Crank up the Death Ray!! :evil:
How about including inflation and adding pimp techs that cost like 100IPCs that you can’t afford until turn 12
-
hey now, you put Bomba’s ol’ NATO, Nukes and Nazis and A&A mechanics together and you got my vote.
Crank up the Death Ray!! :evil:
How about including inflation…
I dunno about that…. but importing N3’s political index would rock :mrgreen:
-
What exactly is Nukes NATo and Nazi’s, I have never heard about it before
-
its Hitler in the 1950’s attacking the parts of the world he didn’t finish off after winning WW2.( North and south America)
-
Id rather fight commies
-
@Imperious:
its Hitler in the 1950’s attacking the parts of the world he didn’t finish off after winning WW2.( North and south America)
Close.
The backstory’s premise is that Hitler is assassinated prior to opening of Second Front and WW2 ends in a stalemate thru diplomatic channels and a Cold War exists for 40 years or so while all sides develop nuclear arms…blah, blah, blah…Anyway, in truth the designers admit that they were working from the fact that people they polled liked three things in wargames:
1. NATO (this was in the Cold War eh)
2. Nukes
and
3. Nazis - cuz they’re just sooooo evil. :evil:hence the name…
-
I am having the US fight the Soveits would be a little refreshing for A&A players
-
I am having the US fight the Soveits would be a little refreshing for A&A players
So like a 1948 kind of scenario?
And what about the other nations? -
Well, I prefer a 1980s scenario, like Red Storm Rising or Red Dawn
but for a 1948, which certaintly would have more similair units with the regular A&A, I would suggest that the countries would be the United Kingdom/Commenwealth, as well as a France/West Germany/Italy hybrid(European Coal Comition or what ever that 50s EU was called) and Communist China. Also there should diplomatic rules for Allainces Like NATO and Warsaw, organizations of nations like the Arab League and the Organization of American States, as well as rules for decoliniztion and non-alligned nations.
-
WWI for sure. Might be more difficult to set up but I think it would awesome.
Suggested Topics
