Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Shouldnt the CCP be named, "PRC" ("People's Republic of China") ??

Global War 1936

455

A

All Encompassing Goose
last edited by

I am going to have to edit the rulebook whenever I start playing G36 AKA maybe 6.2 years from now
G 1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
G

GeneralHandGrenade 18 17 16 @All Encompassing Goose
last edited by

@all-encompassing-goose
No.
The CCP was established in 1921. The PRC wasn’t established until 1949. This game takes place before 1949.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 4

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

185

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

J

USSR entering China

Global War 1936
• • • JbuckBuddy

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

764
Views

C

@jbuckbuddy China at War allows USSR to invade Sinkang in July of 37 but OOB must be July of 1939 but I warn you about doing this because this will cause the Warlords to align to KMT (or whatever the rule book depending on expansions state) and put you at war with KMT which means USSR lost it’s neutrality to the Allies and might cause the Allies to declare war on you.
L

Romania as it’s own team..?

Global War 1936
• • • Linkler

12

0
Votes

12
Posts

1.3k
Views

C

@general-5-stars Thanks for sending! Interesting rules there! A lot of what I was thinking too (glad I was on the right track haha).

Yeah, I think the idea is a lot of fun to have them added in! I think it’s ripe for expansion possibility, but who knows!

@Linkler I don’t remember where I heard this, it might have been one of Doug’s Youtube updates, but I had heard somewhere that they didn’t really have any immediate plans for really any expansions for a little while. They’ve been focusing on Meltdown (which just released) and 1914 so much, as well as Midway earlier this year, that I think any expansions have really taken a back seat! I’d personally like to see expansions as well, since the 1936 game is really the one that interests me haha.
H

2.1 Variable End and CCP Possession of Nanking

Global War 1936
• • • HBG GW Enthusiast

3

1
Votes

3
Posts

458
Views

H

@trig said in 2.1 Variable End and CCP Possession of Nanking:

The KMT is not a major power. Case closed.

Unless it evolves. Then yes.

Definitive! How did I miss that? Thank you, Trig! 8 )
A

Making the Oil Expansion work the way it’s intended: Germany too much oil?

Global War 1936
• • • Aldrahill

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

1.1k
Views

A

Just watched Eastory’s video about the Sino Japanese War, got me thinking more about the oil expansion :P I want Japan to feel like it NEEDS to attack the Indonesian islands for oil! Because of the weird movement rules / not needing oil to move infantry and cavalry when out of oil, the oil system just kind of… doesn’t work properly.

Plus, Germany way too much oil :/
A

Hopeh China

Global War 1936
• • • Adalwolf

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

352
Views

N

Yes, they are adjacent, at least on my v3 map.
A

China: Warlords-KMT-CCP

Global War 1936
• • • AlphaAeffchen

6

0
Votes

6
Posts

968
Views

C

@insaneHoshi good points all around. I wasn’t think big picture when you said that. Of course others would have to be at war to Lend Lease. So yeah, that makes it a different situation anyways. Still though, just goes to show there are a plethora of possibilities!
B

1939 CCP starting income.

Global War 1936
• • • Broken Mortar

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

579
Views

G

@Broken-Mortar Hmmm that’s the only reason I could think of. I just checked the V-3 rules and it’s says 2 so it probably was a typo.
C

What Expansions Don't Work Well Together?

Global War 1936
• • • Chris_Henry

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

1.1k
Views

M

There is some review of expansion compatibility, but modifications are made. My favorite is Oil Wars which can work with anything. I think many of them you have to chose which rule will take precedence if you are playing multiple expansions. The new East vs West nuclear rules will supersede those previously published in Nuclear Weapons Marker rules, so you should not play these together.

10

Online

18.0k

Users

40.8k

Topics

1.8m

Posts