Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Shouldnt the CCP be named, "PRC" ("People's Republic of China") ??

Global War 1936

371

A

All Encompassing Goose
last edited by

I am going to have to edit the rulebook whenever I start playing G36 AKA maybe 6.2 years from now
G 1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
G

GeneralHandGrenade '18 '17 '16 @All Encompassing Goose
last edited by

@all-encompassing-goose
No.
The CCP was established in 1921. The PRC wasn’t established until 1949. This game takes place before 1949.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 4

Featured Topics

League rules idea: mulligans for patrons

Guadalcanal Tournament at Strategicon (Los Angeles) Feb. 17, 2024

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

180

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

J

CCP "Spreading Influence" (V4)

Global War 1936
• • • Jan Aerts

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

489
Views

R

@jan-aerts hey Jan, you are limited by what the maximum influence value. That means in turn 1 you can only increase your influence roll by 1.
If you would control 3 territorries you could spend up to 3 IPP to increase your influence roll.
A

Hopeh China

Global War 1936
• • • Adalwolf

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

288
Views

N

Yes, they are adjacent, at least on my v3 map.
A

China: Warlords-KMT-CCP

Global War 1936
• • • AlphaAeffchen

6

0
Votes

6
Posts

735
Views

C

@insaneHoshi good points all around. I wasn’t think big picture when you said that. Of course others would have to be at war to Lend Lease. So yeah, that makes it a different situation anyways. Still though, just goes to show there are a plethora of possibilities!
B

GWv3 Burma Rd if Yunnan is CCP owned/controled

Global War 1936
• • • bradywh

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

730
Views

B

@Chris_Henry Very true
N

China and Peacetime Income Increases v.3

Global War 1936
• • • Noneshallpass

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

491
Views

C

I think the “each time” thing threw you off a bit there too. That is more in reference to any attacks on other neutrals besides China (Warlords/KMT/CCP all included in that “China” umbrella), and not to potential other attacks on other Chinese factions.

But as GHG said, once a faction of any kind in China is attacked, the rest automatically align, so there couldn’t possibly be any other Chinese factions that could be considered neutral anymore anyways!
C

CCP Recruitment Roll

Global War 1936
• • • Chris_Henry

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

737
Views

C

That’s what GHG is making it sound like to me.

I definitely get your point, I think it’s a lot of fun to be able to select what you’d want to buy as the minor power. But I guess I understand from a “simplifying the rules” standpoint to make this happen.

That said, I wonder what’s more helpful to those nations. Take Greece for example. Do they have better odds of building a unit with their 1 IPP a turn (assuming that territory wasn’t captured right away, that is)? Or are they better off rolling a D12 and needing a 1, 2 or 3 (again, depending on what was or wasn’t taken) to get an infantry/2 militia? Greece conceivably has as a 25% chance to get a unit if no territory lost right away. Those are pretty decent odds.
M

CHINA

Global War 1936
• • • mrgoatcheese

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

590
Views

M

@cdatkins74

I’m still going to try it for the memes. I’m fully aware of any strategic concerns. Making China a major power by upgrading the Jehol factory would be hilarious and therefore 100% worth the attempt.
H

China

Global War 1936
• • • Hopper1999

13

0
Votes

13
Posts

1.4k
Views

C

@cdatkins74 I agree with you. In terms of big picture, Japan doesn’t have a ton of need to go past the coastal territories. That’s where the money is, and where they can maneuver a bit better.

71

Online

17.8k

Users

40.4k

Topics

1.8m

Posts