They the key is having both sides of the map going at same time. This is no way any knock towards any guys games and such.
I know some have time limits to play a country but if you have battle boards on each end of map plus cut back on strategy talking when both players are discussing 1 country which is fine to a certain point then say Germany plays while Japan plays and other side is defending same time.
UK IC in Norway…
-
If one wants to go building a German cv on turn 1, one might as well build a French IC to help out the naval build.
well i wouldn’t be an all out naval build as this would soften things up to much for the russians and the complex in france would make germany to vulnurable to SBR IMO. the IC pointed towards russia would sort of be a way to balance that effort
-
If one wants to go building a German cv on turn 1, one might as well build a French IC to help out the naval build.
well i wouldn’t be an all out naval build as this would soften things up to much for the russians and the complex in france would make germany to vulnurable to SBR IMO. the IC pointed towards russia would sort of be a way to balance that effort
-
I think the only place in '41 for a UK IC is in SA. Maybe one in Egypt if it survives T1, but it’s pretty universal now that everyone takes it T1 for obvious reasons. I’ve heard the case for one in Australia, but I don’t like that one either. It’s too easy for Japan to take out. On J2 it can easily be taken and for sure on J3. So if you’re going to you’d almost have to wait until B4 to have any hope of defending it. I know if I saw a B1 or B2 buy of an IC in Australia I would gun for it hard with Japan.
The Norway IC I just don’t see working because the Brits don’t really need the extra three unit build, plus for the same SBR reason that a France IC for germany isn’t the best idea.
I guess there could be some games where the US having an IC there could help, but on the whole I think that’s just not a great spot for one.
Suggested Topics
