@magnum I’m not yet convinced that letting them pick what they want, and potentially the same thing, is a problem. If anything, this will give them the opportunity to try out different strategies, involving research, and see how they work.
A&A50 Alternative Set-Up
-
Dunno, has anyone tried an E. Canada IC?
I know in Revised it was done because England had an 8 unit build limit and E. Canada could up that to 11 units to be used against Europe each round, assuming England had the income to do it.
England still has an 8 unit build limit and the potential to earn way more than 32 IPC (which is pretty much the theoretical limit to useful cash with a limit of 8 units. That’s 4 infantry and 4 tanks.)
-
@Trisdin:
Trisdin,
I like your group’s idea of replaying some of the more historical battles of WWII. I also like your alternate setup, but have y’all thought about adding some more ICs to the starting setup?
My point is, buying and than placing a factory is the most strategical and creative decision a player can make, where to place it, when to place it and how many should be placed. Sometimes good players are very predictable in the way that alot of strategies are no brainers but placing a factory can be spontanious that is a great thing (IMO). I’m sure some of the guys would love an extra starting factory, that way they won’t have to pay for it and they can dump units on it right away (I’m not a fan of any of that).
I understand your argument about the historical merit of certian countries deserving a factory however, game balance is very fragile when dealing with factories on the board. Canada produced an astonishing amount of destroyers and frigits that basicly turned the war against German U-boats and yet there is only 1 in their sea zone.
If I were to suggest to my group 1 starting factory for Britian, America and Japan (only 1 per/country) Where do you think the best territories would be to place all of them?
Thanks for the compliments on our alternative set-up.
I would have to go with the following:
Britian - Australia
America - Central US
**Japan - Manchuria[/b}
[b]Germany - Czech-Hungary**
Good Post! I might prefer France for Germany, India for Britian for game play but I like you’re reasons for central America for U.S and Manchuria for Japan however, We would play test it before we changed our set-up.
-
I might prefer France for Germany, India for Britain for game play but I like you’re reasons for central America for U.S and Manchuria for Japan however, We would play test it before we changed our set-up.
I was gonna say this too, but Germany needs it in Poland or Chezh
-
@Imperious:
I might prefer France for Germany, India for Britain for game play but I like you’re reasons for central America for U.S and Manchuria for Japan however, We would play test it before we changed our set-up.
I was gonna say this too, but Germany needs it in Poland or Chezh
I understand, spreading thin across Russia is a very difficult task however, all those sea zones available to France are very attractive. In all the A&A games I have played I have never seen “operation sea lion” carried out successfuly, I mean…… why don’t we ever talk about killing UK first? because it’s impossible. Why do we say that Germany is in a two front war when all they ever do is go east? I say it’s time to give Germany a strategical choice to go east, west or both,… the same choice America has every game.
-
A factory is france is worse for Germany, while the others listed are clearly in favor to benefit those players.
Perhaps Romania is best actually. Then Germany can build ships for Medd. Yes i like this better
-
@Imperious:
A factory is france is worse for Germany, while the others listed are clearly in favor to benefit those players.
Perhaps Romania is best actually. Then Germany can build ships for Medd. Yes i like this better
Romania is a good idea, it gives Germany a second sea zone to build ships in and it allows germany to build land units closer to Russia, but is it historicaly accurate or viable.
-
@Trisdin:
@Imperious:
A factory is france is worse for Germany, while the others listed are clearly in favor to benefit those players.
Perhaps Romania is best actually. Then Germany can build ships for Medd. Yes i like this better
Romania is a good idea, it gives Germany a second sea zone to build ships in and it allows germany to build land units closer to Russia, but is it historicaly accurate or viable?
A starting IC in Bulgaria/Romania is not really very historically accurate. A starting factory in Czech-Hungary, Northwestern Europe, or Norway would be much more historically accurate than a starting one in Bulgaria/Romania.
France should have a starting IC, but probably not with the current map. Something more like the AARHE map which has France divided into 2 territories may be more like it, or Northwestern Europe and France should both be worth 4 IPC each, and then put a starting IC in France.
-
Romania would represent OIL for Germany, so its loss by SBR and occupation would have a pronounced effect on Germany. Thats what i was thinking, but also for balance in the event that your not changing the map. France is too scary, Norway is not good, Czechoslovakia is too close to Germany, Poland could work, but Romania at least could give Germany fleet units to help Italy.
-
@Imperious:
Romania would represent OIL for Germany, so its loss by SBR and occupation would have a pronounced effect on Germany. Thats what i was thinking, but also for balance in the event that your not changing the map. France is too scary, Norway is not good, Czechoslovakia is too close to Germany, Poland could work, but Romania at least could give Germany fleet units to help Italy.
I agree with you, and I wish that Romania were a 3 IPC-valued territory, but I don’t believe that it’s very historically accurate for Germany to start with a Romanian IC, and even though Czech-Hungary is very close to Germany, I don’t think anyone playing Germany would be unhappy to have a starting Czech-Hungary IC, and I don’t think that anyone would say there is anything negative about this starting IC except to say that other locations are more attractive, and that’s still not really a negative statement.
-
@Trisdin:
GERMANY ( $ 31 )
Sea Zone 5 – 1 Cruiser, 1 Transport
Sea Zone 6 – 1 Battleship
Sea Zone 7 – 1 Submarine
Sea Zone 8 – 1 Submarine
Sea Zone 13 – 1 Destroyer, 1 Submarine, 1 Transport
Norway – 3 Infantry, 1 Fighter
Finland – 2 Infantry
North-western Europe – 2 Infantry, 1 Tank, 1 Fighter
France – 2 Infantry, 1 Fighter, 1 AA-Gun
Germany – 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 3 Tanks, 1 Fighter, 1 Bomber, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Poland – 4 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 3 Tanks, 1 Fighter
Czechoslovakia / Hungary – 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery
Bulgaria / Romania – 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 3 Tanks, 1 Fighter
Morocco / Algeria – 2 Infantry
Libya – 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank
SOVIET UNION ( $ 30 )
Sea Zone 4 – 1 Submarine
Karelia S.S.R – 4 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Archangel – 2 Infantry
Baltic States – 3 Infantry
Belorussia – 2 Infantry
Russia – 4 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 Fighter, 1 Bomber, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Novosibirsk – 2 Infantry
East Poland – 3 Infantry
Eastern Ukraine – 2 Infantry
Ukraine – 2 Infantry
Caucasus – 4 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Kazakh S.S.R – 2 Infantry
Yukut S.S.R – 1 Infantry, 1 Artillery
Stanovoj Chrebet – 1 Infantry, 1 Artillery
Soviet Far East – 2 Infantry
Buryatia – 3 Infantry
UNITED KINGDOM ( $ 43 )
Sea Zone 2 – 1 Battleship, 1 Cruiser, 1 Transport
Sea Zone 9 – 1 Destroyer, 1 Transport
Sea Zone 12 – 1 Aircraft Carrier / 2 Fighters, 1 Cruiser
Sea Zone 27 – 1 Transport
Sea Zone 35 – 1 Destroyer, 1 Transport
Sea Zone 41 – 1 Destroyer, 1 Transport
Eastern Canada – 2 Infantry, 1 Fighter
U.K – 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 2 Fighters, 1 Bomber, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Egypt – 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 Fighter
Trans-Jordan – 2 Infantry
Belgian Congo – 1 Infantry
Union of South Africa – 2 Infantry
India – 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Fighter, 1 AA-Gun
Burma – 1 Infantry
Kwangtung – 1 Infantry
East Indies – 1 Infantry
Borneo – 1 Infantry
New Guinea – 1 Infantry
Australia – 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 AA-Gun
New Zealand – 1 Infantry
Western Canada – 1 Infantry
ITALY ( $ 10 )
Sea Zone 14 – 1 Battleship, 1 Cruiser, 1 Destroyer, 1 Transport
Italy – 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1Fighter, 1 Bomber, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Balkans – 2 Infantry, 1 Tank
Libya – 2 Infantry
JAPAN ( $ 17 )
Sea Zone 62 – 1 Battleship, 2 Transports
Sea Zone 61 – 1 Cruiser, 1 Destroyer, 1 Transport / 2 Infantry, 1 Transport / 2 Infantry
Sea Zone 36 – 1 Battle Ship, 1 Cruiser
Sea Zone 52 – 1 Aircraft Carrier / 2 Fighters, 1 Aircraft Carrier / 2 Fighters
Sea Zone 48 – 1 Submarine
Japan – 4 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 Fighter, 1 Bomber, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Manchuria – 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Fighter
Kiangsu – 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery
French Indo-China Thailand – 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Fighter
Formosa – 1 Infantry
Okinawa – 1 Infantry
Iwo Jima – 1 Infantry
Caroline Islands – 1 Infantry
UNITED STATES ( $ 40 )
Sea Zone 10 – 1 Destroyer, 1 Transport
Sea Zone 45 – 1 Submarine
Sea Zone 50 – 1 Destroyer, 1 Transport
Sea Zone 53 – 1 Battleship, 1 Cruiser
Sea Zone 54 – 1 Aircraft Carrier / 2 Fighters, 1 Destroyer
Sea Zone 56 – 1 Battleship, 1 Transport
Eastern U.S – 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 Fighter, 1 Bomber, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Philippine Islands – 2 Infantry
Wake Islands – 1 Infantry
Hawaiian Islands – 2 Infantry, 1 Fighter
Midway – 1 Infantry
Alaska – 1 Infantry
Western U.S – 2 Infantry, 1 Fighter, 1 Bomber, 1 Factory, 1 AA-Gun
Central U.S – 1 Infantry
CHINA
Place 1 Infantry unit on each Chinese territory.
China produces 2 Infantry units every round provided that China holds at least 1 Chinese territory.
The U.S player may move Chinese units during their turn and place new Chinese units on any territory China owns.
you want the axis dead before they start?
-
Not sure, Frontovik.
- Seems all countries recive more units
- Germans can still toast most of UK fleet and kill Egypt (that z6 bb is a huge boost)
- Japan’s advance will be slower first rounds (a good thing), and China is boosted and can hold a bit (again, a good thing)
- China lacks any offensive unit (bad). But at least is realist with Flying Tigers: if they are going to die anyway most games, why putting them in setup or making restrictions for them? :-P
Well, at least it’s creative. I could be wrong, but at first sight seems less imbalanced than vanilla setup. It deserves a try.
-
@Trisdin:
@Imperious:
A factory is france is worse for Germany, while the others listed are clearly in favor to benefit those players.
Perhaps Romania is best actually. Then Germany can build ships for Medd. Yes i like this better
Romania is a good idea, it gives Germany a second sea zone to build ships in and it allows germany to build land units closer to Russia, but is it historicaly accurate or viable.
yeah, it’s viable: didn’t antonescu aide the germans allot?
Suggested Topics
