How do U as an axis master like my crazy axis xd
@amon-sul said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
How do U as an axis master like my crazy axis xd
Hehe, I’ll take a look. :)
@trulpen said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@amon-sul said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
How do U as an axis master like my crazy axis xd
Hehe, I’ll take a look. :)
U can watch history too, go to rd 2 xd
I usually win the small battles, just like against U in some old days xd
And i ve spent some 200+ IPC for facilities, which I am sure U think its wise :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
@amon-sul said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
And i ve spent some 200+ IPC for facilities, which I am sure U think its wise :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
Haha, so wasteful! ;)
Anyway, that was a very shaky, yet successful neutral crush. I’ve never seen it before or even considered it in turn 2. Even less so with Axis.
Extremely original, which somehow is your trademark.
I’d say a MIC in Romania is hard to justify, with G having plenty of production-capability already. Sure, two steps closer to the frontier, but you’ll have to build 30 inf there in order to just get square in regards to mechs. And it’s even worse, since you can’t even build units there the turn it’s built, so it’s actually 4 turns of production.
The key to that line of thought is that the mechs you could buy instead would make a bigger impact on the game than the slower units you’d buy closer to the front, simply because they would be in play earlier and also come with extra flexibility and dynamic. Generally speaking mechs are the golden unit for G. I say that without a doubt.
Anyway, it’s a very cool game indeed.
@trulpen said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
I’d say a MIC in Romania is hard to justify, with G having plenty of production-capability already. Sure, two steps closer to the frontier, but you’ll have to build 30 inf there in order to just get square in regards to mechs. And it’s even worse, since you can’t even build units there the turn it’s built, so it’s actually 4 turns of production.
The key to that line of thought is that the mechs you could buy instead would make a bigger impact on the game than the slower units you’d buy closer to the front, simply because they would be in play earlier and also come with extra flexibility and dynamic. Generally speaking mechs are the golden unit for G. I say that without a doubt.
But its interesting how U dislike mechs with Japan ahahha
@amon-sul Well, like you said, not the first time ;)
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 4.0.0
Game History
Round: 8
Purchase Units - ANZAC
ANZAC buy 1 destroyer and 1 submarine; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;
Combat Move - ANZAC
1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Queensland to 54 Sea Zone
1 carrier, 1 destroyer, 1 fighter and 2 submarines moved from 54 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
1 fighter moved from Queensland to 37 Sea Zone
1 fighter moved from 37 Sea Zone to 20 Sea Zone
1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 54 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 37 Sea Zone to Malaya
Combat - ANZAC
Battle in 20 Sea Zone
ANZAC attack with 1 fighter
Japanese defend with 1 transport
1 transport owned by the Japanese lost in 20 Sea Zone
ANZAC win with 1 fighter remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7
Casualties for Japanese: 1 transport
Battle in 37 Sea Zone
British loiter and taunt; Americans loiter and taunt; ANZAC attack with 1 carrier, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters, 2 submarines and 1 transport
Japanese defend with 1 submarine
ANZAC roll dice for 2 submarines in 37 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 0,67 expected hits
1 submarine owned by the Japanese lost in 37 Sea Zone
ANZAC win, taking 37 Sea Zone from Japanese with 1 carrier, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters, 2 submarines and 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6
Casualties for Japanese: 1 submarine
Battle in Malaya
Non Combat Move - ANZAC
1 fighter moved from 20 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
1 submarine moved from 62 Sea Zone to 42 Sea Zone
1 infantry moved from India to Burma
1 submarine moved from 62 Sea Zone to 63 Sea Zone
Place Units - ANZAC
1 destroyer and 1 submarine placed in 62 Sea Zone
Turn Complete - ANZAC
ANZAC collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs
Objective ANZAC 3 Pacific Supply Lines: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 13 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
ANZAC regular : 0,33
@amon-sul said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@trulpen said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
I’d say a MIC in Romania is hard to justify, with G having plenty of production-capability already. Sure, two steps closer to the frontier, but you’ll have to build 30 inf there in order to just get square in regards to mechs. And it’s even worse, since you can’t even build units there the turn it’s built, so it’s actually 4 turns of production.
The key to that line of thought is that the mechs you could buy instead would make a bigger impact on the game than the slower units you’d buy closer to the front, simply because they would be in play earlier and also come with extra flexibility and dynamic. Generally speaking mechs are the golden unit for G. I say that without a doubt.
But its interesting how U dislike mechs with Japan ahahha
Well, J has that inf-train going in China.
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 4.0.0
Game History
Round: 8
Purchase Units - ANZAC
ANZAC buy 1 destroyer and 1 submarine; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;
Combat Move - ANZAC
1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Queensland to 54 Sea Zone
1 carrier, 1 destroyer, 1 fighter and 2 submarines moved from 54 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
1 fighter moved from Queensland to 37 Sea Zone
1 fighter moved from 37 Sea Zone to 20 Sea Zone
1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 54 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 37 Sea Zone to Malaya
Combat - ANZAC
Battle in 20 Sea Zone
ANZAC attack with 1 fighter
Japanese defend with 1 transport
1 transport owned by the Japanese lost in 20 Sea Zone
ANZAC win with 1 fighter remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7
Casualties for Japanese: 1 transport
Battle in 37 Sea Zone
British loiter and taunt; Americans loiter and taunt; ANZAC attack with 1 carrier, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters, 2 submarines and 1 transport
Japanese defend with 1 submarine
ANZAC roll dice for 2 submarines in 37 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 0,67 expected hits
1 submarine owned by the Japanese lost in 37 Sea Zone
ANZAC win, taking 37 Sea Zone from Japanese with 1 carrier, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters, 2 submarines and 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6
Casualties for Japanese: 1 submarine
Battle in Malaya
Non Combat Move - ANZAC
1 fighter moved from 20 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
1 submarine moved from 62 Sea Zone to 42 Sea Zone
1 infantry moved from India to Burma
1 submarine moved from 62 Sea Zone to 63 Sea Zone
Place Units - ANZAC
1 destroyer and 1 submarine placed in 62 Sea Zone
Turn Complete - ANZAC
ANZAC collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs
Objective ANZAC 3 Pacific Supply Lines: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 13 PUs
Combat Move - French
1 destroyer moved from 80 Sea Zone to 39 Sea Zone
Combat - French
Battle in 39 Sea Zone
French attack with 1 destroyer
Japanese defend with 1 submarine
French roll dice for 1 destroyer in 39 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits
Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 39 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,17 expected hits
French roll dice for 1 destroyer in 39 Sea Zone, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits
Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 39 Sea Zone, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0,17 expected hits
French roll dice for 1 destroyer in 39 Sea Zone, round 4 : 1/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits
Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 39 Sea Zone, round 4 : 0/1 hits, 0,17 expected hits
1 submarine owned by the Japanese lost in 39 Sea Zone
French win with 1 destroyer remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6
Casualties for Japanese: 1 submarine
Non Combat Move - French
Turn Complete - French
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
Japanese regular : -0,50
French regular : 0,00
ANZAC regular : 0,33
@pejon_88 OK so my attack with the French des was successful fortunately. Potential attack on SZ37 is now according to picture below. Will he dare to do the attack, which involves all of the remaining air units and almost whole fleet. Don’t mind my mind games ;)
@trulpen said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@amon-sul said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@trulpen said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
I’d say a MIC in Romania is hard to justify, with G having plenty of production-capability already. Sure, two steps closer to the frontier, but you’ll have to build 30 inf there in order to just get square in regards to mechs. And it’s even worse, since you can’t even build units there the turn it’s built, so it’s actually 4 turns of production.
The key to that line of thought is that the mechs you could buy instead would make a bigger impact on the game than the slower units you’d buy closer to the front, simply because they would be in play earlier and also come with extra flexibility and dynamic. Generally speaking mechs are the golden unit for G. I say that without a doubt.
But its interesting how U dislike mechs with Japan ahahha
Well, J has that inf-train going in China.
U mean trannies?
Ah U mean 1 inf in each terittory because of the Guerillas threat. ok. But to move to India and Russia?
@pejon_88 said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@pejon_88 OK so my attack with the French des was successful fortunately. Potential attack on SZ37 is now according to picture below. Will he dare to do the attack, which involves all of the remaining air units and almost whole fleet. Don’t mind my mind games ;)
Yeah, U took some risks, first at Shan State, then this India sz battle, and the biggest of all this sz 37 potential one.
I was calculating and it was 70-80 TUV in Axis favor.
We shall see. I really need to play patiently my next Japan move.
U took a big gamble, we ll see if it turns out good for U.
But first Germany, and Russia.
@amon-sul the problem was the outcome in the US initial attack in which you hit 4/6, 2 of which were bombers at 1 or less 😯
Then I was definitely lucky with UK. The plan was ok but not fool proof in any way.
@pejon_88 said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@amon-sul the problem was the outcome in the US initial attack in which you hit 4/6, 2 of which were bombers at 1 or less 😯
Then I was definitely lucky with UK. The plan was ok but not fool proof in any way.
yeah, the plan was with average dices ok, but the thing with this ˙averageness` is that its tricky.
U already moved ur USA navy before UK turn. If UK turn wasnt that good in Shan, U would have severely worse odds now in sz 37
i had a lot of not satisfied results while doing the Taranto thing with UK before on rd 1. I dislike that strategy cus its severely depends on the dice.
but here is different . u re ready to gamble as a part of a broader strategy. u had nice odds with usa to take my shan,
all i am sayin, considering sz 37 thing, its still a big risk.
that type of battle can go + - 150 from the original TUV prediction
