@Ragnell804 gg, I concede
#1 trulpen (X) vs dawgoneit (A) WaW
-
@trulpen another?
-
@dawgoneit said in #1 trulpen (X) vs dawgoneit (A) WaW:
@trulpen another?
Yes, could be fun, but I’d prefer to change some things. No one seems to be interested in going down that path though.
-
@trulpen what would you like to change. i’m game
-
A bit more in line with G40.
I’m thinking of rule changes for mainly subs and trannies. Also don’t like the blitz-capability for mech, mot and a-cars. They should be able to join tanks on their blitz-endeavours though, but with such a change they would be over-priced.
Changing costs would take extensive work, but on a short note I believe inf are too cheap. Maybe tanks as well.
Regarding subs:
a) Can’t block movement
b) Can’t be hit by air unless there is atleast one opposing des present
c) Des cancel subs abilities of first-strike and unrestricted movement
d) Defense-value @1
e) Cost 6I’m pretty definite regarding a-c, while I feel d-e makes for a better balance in relation to des, but not as crucial. As the game works now there’s really no point in paying 1 IPC more for a des, when you can get an even better ship with a sub. Atleast you only need 1 des per fleet.
I really don’t like that trannies have defense value. I’d prefer that they have 0 defense and also can’t be taken as causalties before war-ships and/or air.
-
@trulpen there is a waw with the normal g40 rules
-
There is? Is it ok? Balanced?
-
@trulpen try the variant ones
-
@dawgoneit you can set it up any way you want. just let me no what side i am.
-
I don’t know this version, but I’d like to try the map “World at War variants”. It’s a separate map that can be downloaded. I’ll try the Axis wheel again.
-
@trulpen Any time your ready. Just let me no witch side i am.