@questioneer:
I have tried this and been on the winning end and the losing end of this. The move is risky, but not sound strategically. Holding off is the better way to do this. If you risk all to get Egypt for Italy on G1 you will be giving up something else on another front (Russian front, France, naval or air support). Don’t get me wrong, winning this battle is awesome but risky- definitely, a gambit. The question to ask yourself is whether or not you can live with losing the battle!!!- especially in a forceful KGF game.
:|
Questioneer
How can you say that this move is too risky or a gambit?
2 Inf, 1 Art, 2 Arm, 1 Bomber vs. 2 Inf, 1 Art, 1 Arm, and 1 Fighter
That’s 15 Attack with 6 units vs. 13 Defense with only 5 units. You should win every time. Of course, sometimes the dice go against you, but one can’t help that. Someone could say that one should never attack unless one has double the attack and number of units, but that won’t win the game. Yes, one must take some risks, (When playing with die rolls, you are forced to do so.) but if you look at the rest of the moves I laid out, the odds are in your favor pretty well. Also, if the first round goes badly, then you can always cut your losses and retreat to Algeria with whatever is left.
With this move, you are still taking your NO from Russia, France is still defended well enough to hold, Your Air units are in okay positions, and UK’s Navy is decimated. They only have 1 Battleship and 1 Transport left.
So my answer is, of course one can live if one loses this battle, but one shouldn’t lose this battle.