Incorrect wording on the Italian NO

[CaptainNapalm]

The Italian national objective states that Italy gets it, if there are no “Allied ships” in the Med, rather than “Allied surface warships”.

[Panther]

@CaptainNapalm Well observed. The game notes can never mirror the complexity of rulebooks, however that would be an easy correction/clarification/fix.

Would you please address this issue here:
https://github.com/triplea-maps/world_war_ii_global/issues

Thank you,

[CaptainNapalm]

@Panther I posted the issue on GitHub.

[Panther]

@CaptainNapalm I have just noticed that. Thank you!

[freh]

Just checking, it’s not just the wording of the NO but the way the rule is applied by the engine, right? Because I’m pretty sure in my last few games, a sub in the Med was enough to cancel out the NO when this shouldn’t have been the case.

[Panther]

@freh said in Incorrect wording on the Italian NO:

Just checking, it’s not just the wording of the NO but the way the rule is applied by the engine, right? Because I’m pretty sure in my last few games, a sub in the Med was enough to cancel out the NO when this shouldn’t have been the case.

I cannot reproduce that. Look here (click the image to enlarge it):

[freh]

My bad on this one Panther. I just finished a game where I thought subs were denying the NO, but it seems even when the allied fleets left the Med, there was at least one dd or ac remaining. Sorry about that! :)