@ShadowHAwk Those units are essential to defend your capital, as well as France’s capital. There is no way around having a substantial defensive force if you want to win the game as the axis. Ideally all of those units could attack Moscow, but that is literally not an option. Germany can lose its capital turn 4 if you don’t have enough units to defend, and Paris can be lost to the allies turn 5 if you aren’t deploying enough units to prevent that.
What is the most unusual/annoying/strange allied bid
-
i edited in a dutch battleship into the caspian sea against @surfer, and we just sorta removed it and we didnt talk about it.
-
**He removed it, not we
-
Aha, a fun prank though. :)
-
i wanted to put some dutch AAA in south america to see if you’d notice, decided against it
-
Eventually I guess, but probably not right away. Would’ve laughed about it.
-
Just put a dutch bs into z128 in one of my games. Looks so funny! I think I’ll let it stay. :grin:
-
@trulpen exactly what i did to surfer
-
he just sorta removed it and we both moved on with our lives knowing that it was possible to do that, it was glorious
-
What I don’t understand is why there’s even a sea zone there?
-
@trulpen for russian battleships of course
-
oh, so planes can fly over it, otherwise they couldnt
-
The perfect plan! mIC in Caucasus and then spam trannies to be able to shift inf to E Persia.
-
@WindowWasher said in What is the most unusual/annoying/strange allied bid:
oh, so planes can fly over it, otherwise they couldnt
A very good reason.
-
could there be any reason to adding like a tank to persia? the brits would claim it and have some help with iraq not requiring air
-
@WindowWasher said in What is the most unusual/annoying/strange allied bid:
could there be any reason to adding like a tank to persia? the brits would claim it and have some help with iraq not requiring air
Only problem with that is the fact that Persia isn’t part of a nation yet.
-
2 Chinese fighters
Suggested Topics
