@trulpen battleship in yugoslavia
Interesting though. Suppose a dutch inf would become aussie/UK when converted? Just like pro-neutrals.
@WindowWasher said in What is the most unusual/annoying/strange allied bid:
@trulpen battleship in yugoslavia
Haha, how!? :laughing:
@trulpen no idea, would be funny if it was possible
Won’t be according to the rules. Don’t think TripleA would allow that placement either.
Apart from that, freakin’ funny!
i edited in a dutch battleship into the caspian sea against @surfer, and we just sorta removed it and we didnt talk about it.
**He removed it, not we
Aha, a fun prank though. :)
i wanted to put some dutch AAA in south america to see if you’d notice, decided against it
Eventually I guess, but probably not right away. Would’ve laughed about it.
Just put a dutch bs into z128 in one of my games. Looks so funny! I think I’ll let it stay. :grin:
@trulpen exactly what i did to surfer
he just sorta removed it and we both moved on with our lives knowing that it was possible to do that, it was glorious
What I don’t understand is why there’s even a sea zone there?
@trulpen for russian battleships of course
oh, so planes can fly over it, otherwise they couldnt
The perfect plan! mIC in Caucasus and then spam trannies to be able to shift inf to E Persia.
@WindowWasher said in What is the most unusual/annoying/strange allied bid:
oh, so planes can fly over it, otherwise they couldnt
A very good reason.
could there be any reason to adding like a tank to persia? the brits would claim it and have some help with iraq not requiring air
