02ff48b8-1b95-4cc1-9262-7db4d99a37b3-image.png
scramble ph? Also how do you send the file like you did? Still somewhat new to the forums.
L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3
-
yeah, i like some of my allied moves, especially destroying and convoying italy,
but as ksmkcay said well , i should focus more on germany with uk and usa , and not italy , if i go heavily to yunan
he praised my strategy but said i need to send less units there
-
adam and farmboy have this great move with uk on rd 1
gibraltar AB , and stacking sz 92 -
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
i am also open to tech since it brings more fun into the game
I’ll try and present a fun system for tech. Not sure when that will happen and would also need a bit of impementation from the developers.
-
but i have to be realistic, i was tier 1 last time, few years ago, i came back and now i am tier E, and i have a lot of places to improve my (game)play so i am not discontent, just i need to take a little break, and more medidating strategies and take fewer games, to be able to put my performances on a greater scale.
i play tier M and E guys only lately, so i have to do my best to put a better resistance
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
adam and farmboy have this great move with uk on rd 1
gibraltar AB , and stacking sz 92Like I said, it’s one of the classic opening moves, abstaining Taranto, but stacking fleet in z92. It’s strong.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
i am also open to tech since it brings more fun into the game
I’ll try and present a fun system for tech. Not sure when that will happen and would also need a bit of impementation from the developers.
it would be great we have it in bm4
-
@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
adam and farmboy have this great move with uk on rd 1
gibraltar AB , and stacking sz 92Like I said, it’s one of the classic opening moves, abstaining Taranto, but stacking fleet in z92. It’s strong.
u think that early sea lion is a trap, ksmkcay thinks going for taranto is a trap
interesting thoughts
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
adam and farmboy have this great move with uk on rd 1
gibraltar AB , and stacking sz 92Like I said, it’s one of the classic opening moves, abstaining Taranto, but stacking fleet in z92. It’s strong.
u think that early sea lion is a trap, ksmkcay thinks going for taranto is a trap
interesting thoughts
Hehe, I think Taranto is strong as well.
Early Sea Lion is definitely crap. Trap-crap. :grin:
-
i am keen to bm3, and i would like to see some improvements in bm4
as for PTV, i would rather wait to see in which direction it will go, and i have an impresion that PTV games will last much longer then BM do.
maybe i am wrong, but thats my first impression.
-
Weren’t we going to play a game with me as Allies where you are committed to an early Sea Lion? :)
The bad thing there though is that I would know about it, but I can promise that I can play my usual style and not reinforce London extra, but rather invite the blow.
-
yeah, sea lion is not the best way to go when the defender expects it
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
i am keen to bm3, and i would like to see some improvements in bm4
as for PTV, i would rather wait to see in which direction it will go, and i have an impresion that PTV games will last much longer then BM do.
maybe i am wrong, but thats my first impression.
I’m playing two games of P2V now. Don’t think it takes longer than BM3. Depends.
The first game with aequitas-et-veritas was more or less over by round 7 or something like that. We’re in the end of round 8 now and Axis have a terrible lead.
My second game with AndrewAAGamer is just in the beginning. Maybe that will be a marathon, who knows?
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
yeah, sea lion is not the best way to go when the defender expects it
If UK haven’t built 1 fig, 6 inf, then it doesn’t matter much. Actually there’s some indication after G1, but after G2 it’s pretty damn clear what’s happening and the UK2-build is rather inconsequential.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
i am keen to bm3, and i would like to see some improvements in bm4
as for PTV, i would rather wait to see in which direction it will go, and i have an impresion that PTV games will last much longer then BM do.
maybe i am wrong, but thats my first impression.
I’m playing two games of P2V now. Don’t think it takes longer than BM3. Depends.
The first game with aequitas-et-veritas was more or less over by round 7 or something like that. We’re in the end of round 8 now and Axis have a terrible lead.
My second game with AndrewAAGamer is just in the beginning. Maybe that will be a marathon, who knows?
by taking longer i also count more time to think what to buy and play
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
i am keen to bm3, and i would like to see some improvements in bm4
as for PTV, i would rather wait to see in which direction it will go, and i have an impresion that PTV games will last much longer then BM do.
maybe i am wrong, but thats my first impression.
I’m playing two games of P2V now. Don’t think it takes longer than BM3. Depends.
The first game with aequitas-et-veritas was more or less over by round 7 or something like that. We’re in the end of round 8 now and Axis have a terrible lead.
My second game with AndrewAAGamer is just in the beginning. Maybe that will be a marathon, who knows?
by taking longer i also count more time to think what to buy and play
Ah, then it’s true. There’re a lot more scramble decisions to make, so yes, it’s a bit more cumbersome.
-
i want to finish my last game remaining against farmboy, and when i finish it i ll instal new version of triple a
and then maybe we can start a new game
-
@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
i am keen to bm3, and i would like to see some improvements in bm4
as for PTV, i would rather wait to see in which direction it will go, and i have an impresion that PTV games will last much longer then BM do.
maybe i am wrong, but thats my first impression.
I’m playing two games of P2V now. Don’t think it takes longer than BM3. Depends.
The first game with aequitas-et-veritas was more or less over by round 7 or something like that. We’re in the end of round 8 now and Axis have a terrible lead.
My second game with AndrewAAGamer is just in the beginning. Maybe that will be a marathon, who knows?
by taking longer i also count more time to think what to buy and play
Ah, then it’s true. There’re a lot more scramble decisions to make, so yes, it’s a bit more cumbersome.
islands can be taken from 4 sides, scramble things, it takes a lot more to think in my opionion
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:
i want to finish my last game remaining against farmboy, and when i finish it i ll instal new version of triple a
and then maybe we can start a new game
Early Sea Lion? drooling :sweat_drops:
-
It’s a lot more difficult to attack certain areas in P2V, due to the scramble-possibility from carriers and land. But I enjoy it. Makes the game more spicy as well.
Suggested Topics
