@Adam514
And the rules list the facilities under the “unit profiles” heading and mentions that they are placed in the “Mobilize New Units phase”.
But otherwise I could not find it referencing them as “units”. So thanks for the clarification
WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread
-
Now the troops just look somewhat retarded, but that’s ok. :grin:
-
@trulpen not retarded, just ‘differently abled.’
-
@regularkid said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
@trulpen not retarded, just ‘differently abled.’
Lol, 16 seems to be perfect for me. Looks very good. Not bracky. Just clean and informative.
-
@trulpen said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
Now the troops just look somewhat retarded, but that’s ok. :grin:
13 is ideal, after that all the numbers are too big and bolded
-
@trulpen post pic of how it looks on ur screen
-
Also, the colors appear a bit softer on Mac than they do on PC (which i like).
-
@Amon-Sul said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
@trulpen said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
Now the troops just look somewhat retarded, but that’s ok. :grin:
13 is ideal, after that all the numbers are too big and bolded
i am speaking of BM
-
This is BM3, size 16.
-
the numbers are white bolded. its ugly. 13 is the biggest size without bolding
-
Forgot to zoom out a bit, now that I have the opportunity. Was the point as before mentioned. Think it looks very good now!
-
Hey guys. Here’s a game-in-progress Adam and I are playing which showcases some of the interesting scenarios and strategies that have already emerged in PTV. Among other things, note the eastern front shenanigans (airbase in Stalingrad), dynamic pacific, and heroic defense of the western front by the Germans. I feel like the game is leaning towards the Axis, but its still close.
joe_TV_nice_game.tsvg -
@trulpen said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
This is BM3, size 16.
i dont like the bolded big numbers near units. i dislike it severely.
-
@Amon-Sul said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
i dont like the bolded big numbers near units. i dislike it severely.
We’re different.
I like to see.
-
I really like a detail with this new map, which is that Leningrad and Stalingrad is called just that.
I understand it’s called Russia because it’s the nation, but I’d actually prefer Moscow there as well, as London, Paris, Berlin, Rome etc. That’s what I call those territories anyway when I write about them here.
I think Egypt could be divided to Egypt and Cairo, with 1 IPC for both, or 2 + 1 like in the Philippines.
Eastern India could be Calcutta, or similarly divided.
A s o.
-
The UK-Pac objective, is it supposed to say z73… 81 or as it is now with z71?
I’m asking since z71 and z72 are part of the Atlantic, not the Indian Ocean.
-
@trulpen Yeah numbers need to be changed on the objectives panel, it’s the Indian Ocean.
-
@trulpen said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
The UK-Pac objective, is it supposed to say z73… 81 or as it is now with z71?
I’m asking since z71 and z72 are part of the Atlantic, not the Indian Ocean.
techically speaking, sz 71 is part of both Atlantic and Indian ocean.
-
@trulpen said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
Eastern India could be Calcutta, or similarly divided.
Actually New Dehli was the capital of India from 1931, right? Here there could also be a choice if New Dehli should be the UK-Pac capital and then it would be hidden inland and not exposed to amphibious attacks. Not sure that would be a good change, or maybe it would.
-
@Amon-Sul said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
@trulpen said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
The UK-Pac objective, is it supposed to say z73… 81 or as it is now with z71?
I’m asking since z71 and z72 are part of the Atlantic, not the Indian Ocean.
techically speaking, sz 71 is part of both Atlantic and Indian ocean.
You mean 73, right? It’s the new map.
-
@trulpen said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
@Amon-Sul said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
@trulpen said in WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread:
The UK-Pac objective, is it supposed to say z73… 81 or as it is now with z71?
I’m asking since z71 and z72 are part of the Atlantic, not the Indian Ocean.
techically speaking, sz 71 is part of both Atlantic and Indian ocean.
You mean 73, right? It’s the new map.
sorry i am looking to bm map , i though its all the same there. sorry
Suggested Topics
