L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3

[Amon-Sul]

Can u please calculate the expected loss for me in TUV

[trulpen]

Ok, I have to assume losses then, but that’s ok. Won’t vary too much.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

Sure, we’ll continue later.

Wouldn’t agree on that assessment though, but opinions vary.

Well i mean, Europe, Med, Med East, Russia, China, India. All good.

Only some (big) problems, with Japanese. And now even bigger xd

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

Ok, I have to assume losses then, but that’s ok. Won’t vary too much.

If u have the time.

If not dont bother. I know u have 10+ games

[trulpen]

-207 for US.

-128 for J.

[trulpen]

TUV-swing of -79.

[Amon-Sul]

Pretty big, but no so big that we call this one over

[trulpen]

No need to give up easily.

[Amon-Sul]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

Sure, we’ll continue later.

Wouldn’t agree on that assessment though, but opinions vary.

Well i mean, Europe, Med, Med East, Russia, China, India. All good.

Only some (big) problems, with Japanese. And now even bigger xd

I meant the position on the board + TUV difference. I HAD +500 TUV recently, and that is, good

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

Sure, we’ll continue later.

Wouldn’t agree on that assessment though, but opinions vary.

Well i mean, Europe, Med, Med East, Russia, China, India. All good.

Only some (big) problems, with Japanese. And now even bigger xd

Russia does not look very healthy at all. If you think the situation in Moscow is stable, you are mistaken. That’s what I think atleast.

The ME is pretty stable at the moment, but only because G set priority to crushing Russia. The ol’ Crushia. ;)

Full control in the Med, but who cares? :grin:

China has Yunnan. That’s about it. Calcutta is on the line, which means the stacking in Yunnan will soon liquify. If not, UK-Pac is history very soon.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

Sure, we’ll continue later.

Wouldn’t agree on that assessment though, but opinions vary.

Well i mean, Europe, Med, Med East, Russia, China, India. All good.

Only some (big) problems, with Japanese. And now even bigger xd

I meant the position on the board + TUV difference. I HAD +500 TUV recently, and that is, good

A lot of that TUV-difference are structures. What’s interesting is rather the unit-TUV, i e fighting power and the position of that power.

[trulpen]

If you want I can count it.

[trulpen]

The situation at the start of Germany’s turn. Of course this usually means that at this stage the Allied TUV will likely have expanded a bit and the Axis TUV likely have shrunk when finishing the round. There’s still a positive income difference to the Allies advantage. Anyhow.

Total TUV
A: 2352
X: 1824
Diff: 528

Structural TUV
A: 753 [6 MIC, 9 mIC, 15 ab, 16 nb]
X: 423 [3 MIC, 9 mIC, 7 ab, 8 nb]
Diff: 330

TUV Units
A: 1599 (333 units)
X: 1401 (275 units)
Diff: 198

At this moment the Allies had a slight over-weight in fighting power on the board, not taking into account power distribution and the strategic value of ab’s, nb’s and factories. There’s however only 198 TUV-difference that’s really relevant, not 528.

[Amon-Sul]

yes of course , structural TUV is important to now, but when the allies have +500 in overall TUV its good.

[Amon-Sul]

i do not have a statistics about structural TUV, so maybe +200 in TUV without structural TUV is good

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

Sure, we’ll continue later.

Wouldn’t agree on that assessment though, but opinions vary.

Well i mean, Europe, Med, Med East, Russia, China, India. All good.

Only some (big) problems, with Japanese. And now even bigger xd

Russia does not look very healthy at all. If you think the situation in Moscow is stable, you are mistaken. That’s what I think atleast.

The ME is pretty stable at the moment, but only because G set priority to crushing Russia. The ol’ Crushia. ;)

Full control in the Med, but who cares? :grin:

China has Yunnan. That’s about it. Calcutta is on the line, which means the stacking in Yunnan will soon liquify. If not, UK-Pac is history very soon.

well, Russia is alive. Has many units.
ME has many units.
China is alive and holding.

It is Japan that worries me, not the Germans

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

The situation at the start of Germany’s turn. Of course this usually means that at this stage the Allied TUV will likely have expanded a bit and the Axis TUV likely have shrunk when finishing the round. There’s still a positive income difference to the Allies advantage. Anyhow.

Total TUV
A: 2352
X: 1824
Diff: 528

Structural TUV
A: 753 [6 MIC, 9 mIC, 15 ab, 16 nb]
X: 423 [3 MIC, 9 mIC, 7 ab, 8 nb]
Diff: 330

TUV Units
A: 1599 (333 units)
X: 1401 (275 units)
Diff: 198

At this moment the Allies had a slight over-weight in fighting power on the board, not taking into account power distribution and the strategic value of ab’s, nb’s and factories. There’s however only 198 TUV-difference that’s really relevant, not 528.

thanks for all the statistics.

well, yes allies have more facilities. but also when allies grab some facility from the axis, it can mean a lot to strategic position ,so its not worthless

[Amon-Sul]

no my tac cant reach sz 10 and i ve retreated

[Amon-Sul]

nevermind i ll put it to hawai

[Amon-Sul]

stupid dices ruined so much