L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

its totally confusing i need to see the map

Ok, lets skip it. Allies are good to go.

[Amon-Sul]

in this map u ve posted u ve don that edits or no?

[trulpen]

I changed my mind about stretching out west in China, but no air battle adjustments there.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpenplay said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

y moved from Suiyuyan to Kansu
Japanese take Kansu from Chinese
1 infantry moved from Hopei to Shensi
Japanese take Shensi from Chine

i see u ve sent too many units in kweichow against just one inf of mine and 1 art
np then do ur edits

so u wish to put less air there in kweicho how much would u pull back?

i can allow it but what about the dice, i think u should roll ur attacking dice again ther e with aas many air u wanted to send in the end

[trulpen]

Thanks for allowing the change, but it’s a bit messy. Re-rolling attack dice works, although I’d say a roll for already rolled dice is better. No biggie. I guess the situation in sz6 is a bit shaky, but maybe not critical, so better not mess with things too much. I should learn to look beforehand more closely.

You may proceed with US.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

ke away 3 air, 2 fig and 1 tac, since they’re needed by Tokyo. I haven’t looked at the dice, but I can do a second roll to find out which dice from the rolled ones to use.

the problem is that u can not now which of the air units did score, the ones that stay or the ones u pulled off. so u would have to roll attacking dice all over again

[Amon-Sul]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

lem is that u can not now which of the air units did score, the ones that stay or the ones u pulled off. so

but u scored 6 hits, and if it wasnt from inf, than it doesnt matter u still could remove them, since even if they missed u would have 2 hits

but did inf missed?

[trulpen]

Both inf missed, so it would matter. I have a good system for correction, which is important especially if there were bad rolls.

[Amon-Sul]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

ut u scored 6 hits, and if it wasnt from inf, than it doesnt matter u still could remove them, since even if they missed u would have 2 hits
but did inf missed?

and it can be tricky since ur altering the number of figs needed on defense after u have seen the dice results

but i trust u it was on oversight

so i u can take care of dice purity then np

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

Both inf missed, so it would matter. I have a good system for correction, which is important especially if there were bad rolls.

u should not make habbit from correctioning battles ;) not because of me, but some harsher players

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

Both inf missed, so it would matter. I have a good system for correction, which is important especially if there were bad rolls.

how would it matter then, u score 6 hits with air units, u want to remove 3, (let s say they all scored) u still have 3 hits left and my 2 units are destroyed

u have 1 hit more actually

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

u should not make habbit from correctioning battles ;) not because of me, but some harsher players

Yes, I agree. So I’ll abstain from it now, despite the over-sight.

[Amon-Sul]

so if there is no problem with dice, make ur edit

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

how would it matter then, u score 6 hits with air units, u want to remove 3, (let s say they all scored) u still have 3 hits left and my 2 units are destroyed
u have 1 hit more actually

Just for the theory of it. I checked the specific battle.

4 fig hit 2.
4 tac hit 4.

Taking away 2 fig and 1 tac leaves.

2 fig, reducing 2 dice. We don’t know if it were the two hits or two misses. It would be a roll of 2D4 (four-sided dice) were we look at the specific numbers, like 1-2 are the hits and 3-4 are the misses. So if that roll was 3 and 4, the figs staying would both miss.

3 tacs hit 3 though, so the above roll would be unnecessary.

The problem here is though that there is information about the result. It hasn’t affected my question (just thought about what would’ve been rational in Kweichow and what I’d like to land with in sz6, with some extra on the side since I wouldn’t know if I’d lose air in Siberia), since I didn’t look into the specific battle, but I’d say that’s a problem.

So we can skip it.

Cheers :)

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

3 tacs hit 3 though, so the above roll would be unnecessary.

but if u scored 6 hits with ur air, and removing 3 of the 8 air it doenst matter if those 3 madde a hit SINCE U NEED 2 HITS ALL TOGETHER AND EVEN 6 MINUS 3 IS 3

so no rolling needed

[trulpen]

That’s very true. So you’re simply saying it’s ok I do a change? Appreciate it! Will get back with a new map then.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

how would it matter then, u score 6 hits with air units, u want to remove 3, (let s say they all scored) u still have 3 hits left and my 2 units are destroyed
u have 1 hit more actually

Just for the theory of it. I checked the specific battle.

4 fig hit 2.
4 tac hit 4.

Taking away 2 fig and 1 tac leaves.

2 fig, reducing 2 dice. We don’t know if it were the two hits or two misses. It would be a roll of 2D4 (four-sided dice) were we look at the specific numbers, like 1-2 are the hits and 3-4 are the misses. So if that roll was 3 and 4, the figs staying would both miss.

3 tacs hit 3 though, so the above roll would be unnecessary.

The problem here is though that there is information about the result. It hasn’t affected my question (just thought about what would’ve been rational in Kweichow and what I’d like to land with in sz6, with some extra on the side since I wouldn’t know if I’d lose air in Siberia), since I didn’t look into the specific battle, but I’d say that’s a problem.

So we can skip it.

Cheers :)

but u didnt loose air in siberia so i m confused

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

That’s very true. So you’re simply saying it’s ok I do a change? Appreciate it! Will get back with a new map then.

just do it

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

but u didnt loose air in siberia so i m confused

Just trying to think like I would’ve thought if no battles had been done.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

but u didnt loose air in siberia so i m confused

Just trying to think like I would’ve thought if no battles had been done.

its ok