L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3

[Amon-Sul]

But can they go totally neutral if allies attack true neutrals? I do not ask for them to become pro axis, just not becomeing soviets or pro soviets if i attack amur

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

i think that future games of u , me against other good players will show we play good and we win against some, loose against some. but still i wont be tier 2, and u wont be tier M

You are atleast E. As I am. We are pretty evenly matched, so I simply just have the opinion that dice has favoured you and that it has made significant impact on both of our games. It’s crazy, and I’m not stating that as a sore loser. You are a deserved winner. You play very interesting and well. Still, your opening plans seem to have serious flaws. Main point, like you said, has been surprise. It’s a strong effect.

I would like to here more about my opening flaws, not because of this game but my future ones, any good advice is welcomed.

And i would liike to hear how so u didnt capitalize on my seriously flawed opening, becides the dice as the reason?

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

I would like to here more about my opening flaws, not because of this game but my future ones, any good advice is welcomed.

And i would liike to hear how so u didnt capitalize on my seriously flawed opening, becides the dice as the reason?

I will try to summarize my thoughts of these two games when this second one is concluded. It has been two very interesting experiences, and I thank you for that.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

But can they go totally neutral if allies attack true neutrals? I do not ask for them to become pro axis, just not becomeing soviets or pro soviets if i attack amur

They were and are still true neutral, so the rule is still in effect. They will only become pro-axis, and hence disband the rule, if Mongolia 🇲🇳 is attacked by Soviet.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Its particularly safe for big battles. I think its made because of them.

And as for small ones, they are affected too if u have a power of at least 6, and opponent does not have a power of at least 7

I could try this with you. But that would in that case be our 4th game, yes?

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

I would like to here more about my opening flaws, not because of this game but my future ones, any good advice is welcomed.

And i would liike to hear how so u didnt capitalize on my seriously flawed opening, becides the dice as the reason?

I will try to summarize my thoughts of these two games when this second one is concluded. It has been two very interesting experiences, and I thank you for that.

I cant wait. I love statistica and analysis a lot :+1:
Please just always when possible use the terms ‘axis’, ‘allies’, ‘germany’…

And not ‘me’ or ‘U’…

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

But can they go totally neutral if allies attack true neutrals? I do not ask for them to become pro axis, just not becomeing soviets or pro soviets if i attack amur

They were and are still true neutral, so the rule is still in effect. They will only become pro-axis, and hence disband the rule, if Mongolia 🇲🇳 is attacked by Soviet.

But can they dont go pro axis but dont go pro allied too, since allies attacked true n?

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Its particularly safe for big battles. I think its made because of them.

And as for small ones, they are affected too if u have a power of at least 6, and opponent does not have a power of at least 7

I could try this with you. But that would in that case be our 4th game, yes?

No, third

[Amon-Sul]

I do not know when will i be able to play italy, possibly tomorrow, but if u wish u may write me ur anzac and french moves so i ll play italy (anzac france) and germany together

[Amon-Sul]

how so u have 2 figs in both persia and india?

[Amon-Sul]

u had 2 figs in persia last round and now u have 2 in persia 2 in india, and u havent bought any nor had any close by that could move there in ncm

[Amon-Sul]

it seems i ll have to play italy tomorrow in the end.

and u said u would like to change ncm too

so we need to take care of uk before we go italy

cheers

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

But can they dont go pro axis but dont go pro allied too, since allies attacked true n?

Now they can never become true allies.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

I do not know when will i be able to play italy, possibly tomorrow, but if u wish u may write me ur anzac and french moves so i ll play italy (anzac france) and germany together

I’ll try to. They are very uncomplicated.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

how so u have 2 figs in both persia and india?

I bought 2 figs this round.

I think UK is ok. I’ll look, but I mainly just changed the build with a mech in Persia instead of S Africa and the art respectively.

[Amon-Sul]

Sorry my mistake i waa looking the wrong history log in triple a, its not 17, but 18th turn alreadY man

Its late its been a long busy day for me i am obviousl y tired

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

how so u have 2 figs in both persia and india?

I bought 2 figs this round.

I think UK is ok. I’ll look, but I mainly just changed the build with a mech in Persia instead of S Africa and the art respectively.

Its better u look it in peace and i ll play italy germany in the morning in peace

[trulpenplay]

TripleA Manual Gamesave Post: Italians round 18

TripleA Manual Gamesave Post for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.4

Game History

Round: 18

    Purchase Units - Italians
        Turning on Edit Mode
        EDIT: Removing units owned by British from Persia: 1 artillery
        EDIT: Adding units owned by British to Persia: 1 mech_infantry
        EDIT: Removing units owned by British from Union of South Africa: 1 mech_infantry
        EDIT: Adding units owned by British to Union of South Africa: 1 artillery
        EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode

Combat Hit Differential Summary :

Savegame

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

I do not know when will i be able to play italy, possibly tomorrow, but if u wish u may write me ur anzac and french moves so i ll play italy (anzac france) and germany together

I’ll try to. They are very uncomplicated.

I mean u dont have much units and its not much action on aussie land

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

how so u have 2 figs in both persia and india?

I bought 2 figs this round.

I think UK is ok. I’ll look, but I mainly just changed the build with a mech in Persia instead of S Africa and the art respectively.

But this decision can be because of the (unaxpected) dice results.,? No problem with changing placement locations, but it would not be ok u change buyings