L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3

[trulpenplay]

TripleA Turn Summary: French round 7

TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.4

Game History

Round: 7

    Purchase Units - ANZAC
        ANZAC buy 1 artillery and 1 destroyer; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 

    Combat Move - ANZAC
        1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Queensland to 54 Sea Zone
        1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 54 Sea Zone to 41 Sea Zone
        1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 41 Sea Zone to Sumatra
        1 destroyer moved from 54 Sea Zone to 63 Sea Zone
        3 fighters moved from 50 Sea Zone to 63 Sea Zone

    Combat - ANZAC
        Battle in Sumatra
            ANZAC attack with 1 artillery and 1 infantry
            Japanese defend with 1 artillery
                ANZAC roll dice for 1 artillery and 1 infantry in Sumatra, round 2 : 0/2 hits, 0,67 expected hits
                Japanese roll dice for 1 artillery in Sumatra, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits
                ANZAC roll dice for 1 artillery and 1 infantry in Sumatra, round 3 : 1/2 hits, 0,67 expected hits
                Japanese roll dice for 1 artillery in Sumatra, round 3 : 1/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits
                1 artillery owned by the Japanese and 1 infantry owned by the ANZAC lost in Sumatra
            ANZAC win, taking Sumatra from Japanese with 1 artillery remaining. Battle score for attacker is 1
            Casualties for ANZAC: 1 infantry
            Casualties for Japanese: 1 artillery
        Battle in 63 Sea Zone
            ANZAC attack with 1 destroyer and 3 fighters
            Japanese defend with 1 submarine
                ANZAC roll dice for 1 destroyer and 3 fighters in 63 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/4 hits, 1,83 expected hits
                Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 63 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,17 expected hits
                1 submarine owned by the Japanese lost in 63 Sea Zone
            ANZAC win, taking 63 Sea Zone from Neutral with 1 destroyer and 3 fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6
            Casualties for Japanese: 1 submarine

    Non Combat Move - ANZAC
        3 fighters moved from 63 Sea Zone to New Zealand
        1 artillery and 5 infantry moved from South Australia to New South Wales
        2 aaGuns moved from Queensland to New South Wales
        1 cruiser moved from 54 Sea Zone to 50 Sea Zone

    Place Units - ANZAC
        1 destroyer placed in 54 Sea Zone
        1 artillery placed in New South Wales

    Turn Complete - ANZAC
        Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 3
            Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 62 Sea Zone. Rolls: 3,4
        ANZAC collect 11 PUs (3 lost to blockades); end with 11 PUs
        Objective ANZAC 3 Pacific Supply Lines: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 14 PUs

    Combat Move - French

    Non Combat Move - French
        3 infantry moved from Morocco to Algeria
        1 infantry moved from Nigeria to French Equatorial Africa
        1 destroyer moved from 80 Sea Zone to 71 Sea Zone

    Turn Complete - French

Combat Hit Differential Summary :

ANZAC : -1,17
Japanese : 0,17

Savegame

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

So this is one of the two big reasons then, why do U prefer games against me comparing to others.

First would be my speed I suppose, not fast as U (no one is ;) ) but faster than average I suppose.

Your speed is definitely a factor.

I like playing others as well, it’s just that you have these very unorthodox strategies which you somehow make work. It’s like the revival of some off-beat opening in chess. Looks very fishy at first sight, but then seems to work out in the long run. Like the Black Knight’s Tango (or Mexican) or the King’s Gambit to name two out of many.

As far as I know nobody plays or have played like this except me, especially with the allies.

[Amon-Sul]

And it would not be so fun if it would be a loosing strategy.

[Amon-Sul]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

P.S.

Watch out for that sub in sz 91, if it lives until the end of the UK`s turn, UK Pacific will not get 3 IPC from West Indian Ocean NO.

sorry, sz 71. Red Sea.

[Amon-Sul]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

P.S.

Watch out for that sub in sz 91, if it lives until the end of the UK`s turn, UK Pacific will not get 3 IPC from West Indian Ocean NO.

sorry, sz 71. Red Sea.

sorry, 81 sz. Red Sea.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

U mean NG ? Well, i ve lost only one fig so far, and bought 2 tacs. xd

No, I meant the German Navy.

Oh yes, Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe are big part of the Reich power.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Oh yes, Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe are big part of the Reich power.

And of course the panzar. But hey, where is the meat-wall? The great glorious cannon-fodder of ze Third Reich?

[Amon-Sul]

so 2 nations played, without posting more maps, and no edits. well done.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Oh yes, Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe are big part of the Reich power.

And of course the panzar. But hey, where is the meat-wall? The great glorious cannon-fodder of ze Third Reich?

inf?

i have mechs xd

[Amon-Sul]

have u moved those usa guys

[trulpen]

Yes, they’re part of the panzar, I’d say. But true, it’s the tanks meat-wall, alright.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

have u moved those usa guys

Nah, I decided that I’d stick it all in NSW anyway. Saw that you were able to sneak around and make a landing in S Australia along with dark skies of air. Didn’t want to risk that.

[trulpen]

I’ll leave in about 30 min and will be back in perhaps 2 h after that, but I presume you won’t be able to make G within that time frame. So, just wanted to say that you can take your time with G. It’s tricky alright. Or maybe it’s not right now?

[Amon-Sul]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

So this is one of the two big reasons then, why do U prefer games against me comparing to others.

First would be my speed I suppose, not fast as U (no one is ;) ) but faster than average I suppose.

Your speed is definitely a factor.

I like playing others as well, it’s just that you have these very unorthodox strategies which you somehow make work. It’s like the revival of some off-beat opening in chess. Looks very fishy at first sight, but then seems to work out in the long run. Like the Black Knight’s Tango (or Mexican) or the King’s Gambit to name two out of many.

As far as I know nobody plays or have played like this except me, especially with the allies.

And I definitely have unorthodox strategies since i am a catholic, and not orthodox xd (just joking)

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

I’ll leave in about 30 min and will be back in perhaps 2 h after that, but I presume you won’t be able to make G within that time frame. So, just wanted to say that you can take your time with G. It’s tricky alright. Or maybe it’s not right now?

i ll try now, i ll go look the map

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

And I definitely have unorthodox strategies since i am a catholic, and not orthodox xd (just joking)

Hehe, I don’t believe in strategies. I’m atheist.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

And I definitely have unorthodox strategies since i am a catholic, and not orthodox xd (just joking)

Hehe, I don’t believe in strategies. I’m atheist.

Well faith is not a strategy. And for winning in A & A U need a strategy eheh

since U re a chess player,
i ve heard that in chess U need 3 things to succeed

1. be smart
2. have good strategies
3. have patience

[Amon-Sul]

I think I can definitely do it in 20 minutes if i am not interrupted by family issues. i ll try

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Well faith is not a strategy. And for winning in A & A U need a strategy eheh

It was just a silly counter-joke of my own. :)

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

since U re a chess player,
i ve heard that in chess U need 3 things to succeed

1. be smart
2. have good strategies
3. have patience

There’s truth in that, although being smart is likely over-rated. You benefit from a good memory though and spatial perception (seeing patterns).

I’d say that tactics is likely about 90 % of the game. Positional factors are important, but if missing tactics a solid advantage or amazing recovery may be wasted.

Patience is bliss, although not in blitz.

[Amon-Sul]

I ve lost internet wi fi conection