L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3

[trulpen]

Yes, I’ll try and be patient. You sleep well now.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Well I need to watch my every move very closely. I feel like I am playing against chess computer which does not make mistakes.

Haha, like changing the purchase into a completely wasted ab and losing a tr, ac and cr?

Well I had courage there.
I had luck there.

and U did not expect that Ur sub could not fight there.

So I had 3/3 , all things fell the right way.

[Amon-Sul]

and the airbase is not waisted. U are using it (well) since then , and probably will do in the future.

ok, i ll go look germany.

cheers

[Amon-Sul]

Germany is the most complex Axis power for me to play with. Do not know how it is for U, is it maybe Japan?

[trulpen]

Yes, I think Japan is the most complex in the beginning atleast, with all that air. But it evens out. Both are challenging.

[Amon-Sul]

And what do U say about Italy?

[trulpen]

Very fun when they thrive, but is usually tightly kept. Not in this game though. You’ve played them aggressive and well.

[Amon-Sul]

That ankward start of German turn when U have 4 ICs to repair xd

[trulpen]

The only two shadows in your setups is holding out on the Russians and lack of land in Asia.

[trulpen]

Yes, and not so high income as well. That hurts. Which was the point of all that SBR.

[trulpen]

Don’t think you’ll repair it all, but that’s 21 IPC of damage. A bit on the low side. With mean dice it would’ve been 27-28.

[trulpen]

I took quite a high risk there when blocking with 2 des. If Italy had succeded breaking the block that whole fleet would now be ocean filling.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

The only two shadows in your setups is holding out on the Russians and lack of land in Asia.

Yeah, well, I am a solid, not a perfect player.

And some sacrificies had to be made for greater good.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Yes, and not so high income as well. That hurts. Which was the point of all that SBR.

I miss Novgorod, that is +7 ;)

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

And some sacrificies had to be made for greater good.

Said the Nazi! :laughing:

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

I took quite a high risk there when blocking with 2 des. If Italy had succeded breaking the block that whole fleet would now be ocean filling.

I had 30 % I think, I simply had to try.

[trulpen]

Yes, that was the main point of stacking there. Not so much to put pressure on Finland and Norway. On short sight that’s rather pointless for dear Russia.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

The only two shadows in your setups is holding out on the Russians and lack of land in Asia.

What do U mean by holding out on the Russians, U mean playing too defensively against Russia?

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Yes, that was the main point of stacking there. Not so much to put pressure on Finland and Norway. On short sight that’s rather pointless for dear Russia.

Allied cooperation. nice.

[trulpen]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Yes, that was the main point of stacking there. Not so much to put pressure on Finland and Norway. On short sight that’s rather pointless for dear Russia.

At the same time I had a very good alternative of staying in Belarus and preventing intrusion in E Poland. But maybe I didn’t have quite enough for that feat?