i will not mind either if america ignores me as japan i will just say meh attack asia and russia say germany 1 fornt now and then germany and japan will have 1 front each not 2
/Funcioneta
If you want an impression of how China holds up vs. a Japanese attack given this set-up, please look at this thread (maps use Abattlemap);
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=12531.0
We played an AA50 game almost correctly, we missed sub rules a bit and made some mistakes in Russia with the Allies but as for the Pacific it is an OK game I think for both sides (it’s still ongoing, but we will probably be re-playing soon because of the mistake losing Caucasus early on which looks like it lost Allies the game. This can be prevented by the Soviet player). Notice that China is retreating in an orderly fashion and that a break-through on the land front is most likely to come in India. Next game we will try to protect India from the Japs, but we have no idea of how so far!
I don’t think IND IC is a viable strat.
With Italy making 15-20 ipc and Germany 45-50 , Russia will need some heavy backing in order to survive, I think.
BTW - I just can’t see how IND shall survive , with 8 starting Jap ftrs , and 2 bombardment shots available already on Jap2, it looks tough for an IC to survive…
If you want an impression of how China holds up vs. a Japanese attack given this set-up, please look at this thread (maps use Abattlemap);
If you want an impression on how to play Allies properly in AA50 , then DON’T look at that game :-)
/Perry
After this game, I challenge you to a game where I play the Allies… :wink:
/Funcioneta
If you want an impression of how China holds up vs. a Japanese attack given this set-up, please look at this thread (maps use Abattlemap);
This match is pretty odd, but still …
Why let chinese fighter alive? Why let a lone chinese unit alive in round 1? Even ignoring chineses,Japan got Godzilla status pretty soon, go figure killing China round 1. Ignoring soviet front bad choices, I would say China has no chance in your game. At very least, I would kill Chinese fighter round 1, but seems China, then Asia and Pacific and then allies are doomed with this setup. I guess this is not the true setup or that we shall get heavy bids for China, this setup favors japan heavily.
Just a question … why not a saf IC?
I thikn an ic in australia is klooking happier then india. India would makae more land forces for japan and make them have 1 big front.
Why not add a new front so japan would have south isaldns usa and asia hmmsounds like real world war 2 to me.
The only reason why the axis lost was more and more fronts thats what gb should do austrlia ic!
I have played Australia IC few times in Revised, but has a strange effect in Japanese players. They start doing strange things, aiming all to Australia and losing the focus on other zones. It’s a tricky strat because Australia can fall round 2 if allies don’t take care, but if success, it’s very powerful.
I have played Australia IC few times in Revised, but has a strange effect in Japanese players. They start doing strange things, aiming all to Australia and losing the focus on other zones. It’s a tricky strat because Australia can fall round 2 if allies don’t take care, but if success, it’s very powerful.
See the australian factory is a better spot since the japanese have areason to go pacific way( austrlai make sjapan more boat relieves russia)
Don’t do this always surprise him!
Ok, Im going to go against the current here and put my neck out…
I think a British IC in India is a good idea!
For the following reasons:
I guess we are all just speculating as we dont have a TRUE set-up map… But I will be giving the Indian IC a go as Britain!
Agreed, but only if final setup gives a chance. If you can hold India past J3 as could be done in Revised, it’s very good build IC at India. I hope it will be so, and if it’s not possible, it would be a setback from Revised.
I am hoping that there are IC in both India and Australia, but I am not holding my breath. It would be a good way of insuring that you have fighting in the Pacific.
At least USA will need fight the Pacific or this is a sure axis win this time. The doubt is if UK will have a chance of join Pacific or Asia fights. I hope at least Australia IC will be competitive
Finally the final setups are about to be released…1 country/day 10-14 Nov.
However, the US & China setup didn’t bring any more allied units into the Pac/Asian theatre, so we’ll have to hope for the UK setup to beef up the Allies …
Perry where is the link to the final setup. I checked avalon hill and didnt find it there.
IL posted in the general AA50 forum, and the thread is here:
http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?p=17222181#post17222181
They drop 1 country definite setup per day. Right now they’ve only done US & China. Tomorrow it is time for Soviet Union…
Given that the USSR set up shows 2 AA guns and no Industrial Center in Russia, you really think that the set ups are going to be accurate? This is a bit ridiculous.
http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?p=17228451&posted=1#post17228451
i am a bit frightful about how the chinese are set for 1942 i hopefully hope that japan will be buffed up a bit more ( china has almost twice as many men)
Also a new thing happened a us bomber in great britian please!
USA starts with three bombers western + eastern usa and gb (loaded up usa for bombing runs please) Also i am quite mad that russia has only 1 tank and no fighters i beleive that russia should have 4 tanks and 1 fighter. I might make my own version hopefully i do not anyways (india will be buffed up trust me if this is how it goes india needs to be better or…… usa wont be able to do kgf yes finally moohahahahahaha beet you all i win!!!
^^ :?^^
Pardon?
LOL, i am just so happy maybe kgf might not happen i think i am crying :? no its just my smile that is smiling brightly.
Now i will play the music of happiness!@!!@!!@!!@!!@!!@!!@!!@!
