@azpathfinder heh heh and when Germany attacks lol I guess it could be russia too : )
So far right on the icons then back one will be upload image
FastHeinz G40 Painted Pieces
-
I decided the do the American Navy in two different color schemes. Early war and later war.
-
Thanks that worked, it would only allow me 1 picture though. Anyways here are some more.
You can post 2 attachments per message, using the “(more attachments”) option after “Choose file”.
-
I used Corsair fighters from HBG as carrier fighters. A close eye can spot the U.S.S. Missouri.
-
Very impressive. I can’t wait to see how the army turns out
-
This is the Airforce.
-
FasHeinz, great work, on these US units. Cannot wait to see more.
Cheers!
John
-
I used Corsair fighters from HBG as carrier fighters. A close eye can spot the U.S.S. Missouri.
I like your work, it’s top notch… very serious, its really fine painting… I will say however, choosing the Corsair as your default carrier fighter, while it looks very nice, historically speaking, is hard to accept as the main carrier fighter… The combination of an aft cockpit and the Corsair’s long nose made landings hazardous for newly trained pilots. During landing approaches it was found that oil from the hydraulic cowl flaps could spatter onto the windscreen, badly reducing visibility, and the undercarriage oleo struts had bad rebound characteristics on landing, allowing the aircraft to bounce out of control down the carrier deck… It was also found that the Corsair’s right wing could stall and drop rapidly and without warning during slow carrier landings. In addition, if the throttle were suddenly advanced (for example, during an aborted landing) the left wing could stall and drop so quickly that the fighter could flip over with the rapid increase in power… there were so many problems with the F4U’s use on carriers, Corsair deployment aboard U.S. carriers was delayed until late 1944… by which time there were almost no Japanese left to fight in Carrier battles. The Corsair’s claim to fame mostly comes from the USMC’s use on island bases, not the Navy’s use on carriers.
When I think carrier battles in the Pacific, I think of F4F Wildcat and F6F Hellcat. Of course, that’s just me… I’m a stickler for the standard.
None of my musings have anything to do with the fine work you’ve done… I’m super-jelly of all the fine detail (down to the battleship numbers, and different deck colors you’ve used) and wish I had a thimbleful of talent that you have.
-
They all look fantastic, but I absolutely love those silver bombers. :-o
-
Thanks for the feedback everyone, greatly appreciated. Ive made some progress on the army and I thought I would share. The artillery is finished, including spg’s and flak.
-
Those planes are simply amazing, wonderful job!!!
-
The detail on everything (considering the tiny size of the sculpts) is simply AMAZING… super jelly.
-
Nice work. Very clean.
-
Nice work!
-
Hi FastHeinz,
What brand of acrylics are you using? Your colors are so flat and the coats are so smooth. It looks like high end stuff. If it’s not something like Vallejo, did you thin it down and do lots of coats?
Nice work!
-
Hi Spitfire38 I have been using Games workshop paints, they run about 5$ Canadian a bottle which are pretty tiny! I have always been pretty happy with them though and they have a huge selection, designed for miniature painting.
-
Ah yes, the expensive stuff. :) Well, it looks wonderful! Thanks for sharing your work with the community.
-
Nice work!
Combat Miniatures, custom pieces for your A&A games.
-
@johnson73 thank you!
-
What color did you use for US ?
Where assuming your pieces are all painted now after 4 years ?
-
@gen-manstein I don’t remember I’d have to check, and no haha,. My painting seems to go through phases where I’m really into it and then summer roles around or life gets busy and I put it on the back burner. I don’t really have anyone to play with these days so getting motivated to paint pieces isn’t always easy.
Suggested Topics
