I think subs are underestimatedâŚ
I like them a lot more than the Cruiser for instance. The extra cost of 6 IPCâs doesnât make up for the shore bombardment and extra punch.
Now, letâs take a look at their advantages:
-subs are CHEAP! 6 IPCâs for a naval hit is dirt cheap!
-subs are invulnerable to lone enemy aircraft => this allows them to swim around Europe/Pacific avoiding those German/Japanese ftrs.
-subs canât attack airplanes, and apart from DDâs, other sea units are more expensive than airplanes. As a result, if a fleet has got only 1 DD, it wonât stand a sub attack, because the expensive carriers, cruisers, and battleships will be the first to get hit. This is often underestimated!
-subs have a greater mobility than other fleet units because they canât be attacked without an enemy DD.
disadvantages:
-1 defense is little, even for 6 IPCâs. Donât count on subs to stand tall against an organized attack.
-subs canât hit air, but air with DD can hit subs
-subs donât like a lot of DDâs (a single DD is seldom a problem)
To summarize: I like subs a lot the way they are implemented now. And I think Germany building a sole sub fleet is a viable strategy. If you just donât let the British navy too close, the subs+air will keep the baltic.