Crazy George!

[axis_roll]

@Nix:

Let me explain my Views on the FIC attack, since i was the one who primarilly used it on these boards (i believe)

Attacking FIC should be done with these things in Mind:

Russia did Hit westrussia and belorussia (no ukraine).
Russia moved 6 inf to Buryatia
2 Arm to Yakut
Russia bought 3 inf, 3 arms.
Assembled everything else in Westrussia, and moved novo evenki inf to russia, kazhak inf to Cauccasus.
Builds 3 inf in Cauccasus.

Yes Germany can now take cauccasus for 1 round, but it costs.

UK builds 1 IC (maybe 1 fig, 1 arm to i don´t know.) and attacks the usual targets:
ex: SZ59 (ac, dest)
Sub to SZ45.
Trn of australia stays put (maybe pulling 1 inf from new zeeland to australia.
UK landing in Algeria along with reinforcements from USA
UK airforce will attack SZ5 withdraw when trn is dead.

If FIC is cleared from land units IC is placed in India, otherwise it´s placed in Australia.
If IC is in India USA builds IC in Sinkiang (witch gets 3 arm reinforcements if needed, (5 if japan kills buryatia)
If japan does not kill Buryatia then 6 inf9+ arm will go into manchuria (be renforced possiably by 1 UK fig if it lived thrue uk1)

This will seriously harm japans offense.
Personally i belive an unrestricted Japan is more dangerous then unrestricted Germany.

HELLO KJF!

A good axis counter would be to take caucasus and land the Ukraine ftr from that battle in FIC to support japan since you are obviously set up to go after Japan.

[Nix]

Sure you can, that only means germany is down 1 Fighter for 1 round, and UK does something else, and Russia can still withdraw all forces (exception might be buryatia inf).

So it´s not really that “strange”.  Your not fully committed until after uk1.

[Nix]

And to add, all my games basically where im allies starts with basically the same russian 1.

But i don´t always attack japan anyway.

[axis_roll]

@Nix:

Sure you can, that only means germany is down 1 Fighter for 1 round, and UK does something else, and Russia can still withdraw all forces (exception might be buryatia inf).

So it´s not really that “strange”.  Your not fully committed until after uk1.

I never implied it was strange, I said it smacked of KJF.

Most of the time, Germany is down 1 ftr right from the get go (Ukraine attack) so it wouldn’t be missed.

[Jennifer]

@U-505:

OK. This is getting old. You keep making baseless assuptions about stuff without detailing how they come about. Please explain how the UK is taking the East Indies and the Philippines without getting smashed by a Japanese fleet that is 3 times larger than the one UK has in the area.

Borneo falls on UK 1 or UK 3 depending on which flavor of KJF you go for.

Japan ignores the British fleet because the Americans are being a pest.  It’s either attack England or attack America and America’s the one building more fleet every round out numbering you.

If Borneo falls on UK 3, then E. Indies falls on UK 2 and Philippines on UK 4.

[Jennifer]

And, for the record, I don’t do the Ukraine attack with Russia anymore.  Too risky.  I’m throwing away 3 tanks, 1 artillery and 3 infantry to get 3 infantry, 1 armor, 1 fighter and 1 artillery.  28 IPC from Russia and 75% of their starting tanks for 28 IPC from Germany and 1 of their 6 fighters.  That battle can go horribly wrong (and for me usually does) resulting in maybe not taking it or only having 1 tank left to defend.  Though I’ve seen it go horribly wrong for Germany, is that really a risk Russia wants to take on in the first round of the game?

Safer is attacking Belorussia and W. Russia.  Serves the same purpose of knocking down the German war machine, if it goes bad for Russia, Russia’s only out some infantry, not tanks!

[frood]

@Cmdr:

And, for the record, I don’t do the Ukraine attack with Russia anymore.  Too risky.  I’m throwing away 3 tanks, 1 artillery and 3 infantry to get 3 infantry, 1 armor, 1 fighter and 1 artillery.  28 IPC from Russia and 75% of their starting tanks for 28 IPC from Germany and 1 of their 6 fighters.  That battle can go horribly wrong (and for me usually does) resulting in maybe not taking it or only having 1 tank left to defend.  Though I’ve seen it go horribly wrong for Germany, is that really a risk Russia wants to take on in the first round of the game?

Safer is attacking Belorussia and W. Russia.  Serves the same purpose of knocking down the German war machine, if it goes bad for Russia, Russia’s only out some infantry, not tanks!

For once we agree!

[U-505]

@Cmdr:

@U-505:

OK. This is getting old. You keep making baseless assuptions about stuff without detailing how they come about. Please explain how the UK is taking the East Indies and the Philippines without getting smashed by a Japanese fleet that is 3 times larger than the one UK has in the area.

Borneo falls on UK 1 or UK 3 depending on which flavor of KJF you go for.

Japan ignores the British fleet because the Americans are being a pest.  It’s either attack England or attack America and America’s the one building more fleet every round out numbering you.

If Borneo falls on UK 3, then E. Indies falls on UK 2 and Philippines on UK 4.

Don’t see it happening. Nope, nope, nope. Japan has more than enough fleet to chase the UK out of the Pacific for many turns. And if UK takes Borneo on UK1, they will have nothing left after Japan stomps them on J1.

For the record, if the UK tries to preserve their fleet on UK1, I’m not going to extend Japan’s fleet beyond my abilities to defend against a backdoor attack by them. You might get one of those islands, but you aren’t going to get all of them. The japanese can position their fleet to cover those islands and still keep an eye on the US. As long as the US can’t overwhelm the Japanese navy, putting the Japanese fleet in sz50 will cover all of their islands and keep the US from advancing until they have a much larger fleet than they start with.

[Guest]

And also remember this…

UK fleet within range of the Asian coast means 6 FIG, 1 BOM in addition to the Imperial Navy for the attack on UK’s mini fleet.

[Jennifer]

And a drain on Japanese resources allowing American to pummel Japan to death without loss.

Okay, with minimal losses.

You are forced to chose, hit the American fleet and keep it from being a monster, or chase the pissant fleet of the British allowing American to push into your heartland and attack you with impunity.

[U-505]

Well first, the US will need at least 2 turns to become the monster you speak of and with the IC built in Sink on US 1 maybe even 3 turns.

Second, and most importantly, Japan doesn’t chase fleets in a KJF. It’s fleet is for defense of it’s territories and interdiction of the Allied fleets. It only attacks if the Allies leave it a juicy target within range. The lion doesn’t move. It just sits and waits. The prey will come to it.

[Guest]

Japan is IMMEDIATE reinforce with builds
USA is 1-2 turns delayed reinforcement from builds
UK is NO reinforcement.

[Jennifer]

Okay, so if Japan is IMMEDIATE reinforcement, then you are NOT chasing down the British fleet and thus they have free reign.

Can’t have it both ways Switch.  You either have to chase them down and thus split your navy allowing America to move in and assume the defense posture off Japan OR you maintain a defense and lose some islands to the sniping of England.  Compounded with the fact you have stated you are building fleet for reinforcements meaning you have nothing new going into Asia meaning you have lost 9 IPC right there.  Any landings you might do are going into Buryatia, not exactly prime realestate, if you ask me.

[U-505]

The point is that Japan doesn’t chase the UK. If you think the UK fleet is going to take one of the Japanese islands that are within range(read: every single one) of the Japanese fleet then you will be trading the UK fleet for the income of 1 island for 1 turn. Maybe 2. So the only thing the Allies get is that the Japanese fleet is out of position for a turn and the US fleet can go to the Solomans without being threatened by Japan. But, the closer they get to Japan the further away from their reinforcements they are and the more Japanese units they bring into range.

[Jennifer]

No, the point is Japan is cowering in SZ 60 trying not to become lunch for America, according to Switch’s post.

That means England’s taking E. Indies, out of range of SZ 60 and New Guinea.  By then America will have plenty of boats to protect England as they take Borneo and Philippines and Okinawa.

Since you arn’t going to chase them down, that means they are immune to Japan. :)

And if you do chase them down, America slides into SZ 60/61 ending all future purchases and forcing you to attack America or give up the Pacific.

[Guest]

I am so glad you misread my post.

I NEVER said that Japan was cowering in SZ60.
I said they could REINFORCE SZ60 immediately, while UK was a suicide fleet, and USA was slow to reinforce.

[trihero]

And, for the record, I don’t do the Ukraine attack with Russia anymore.  Too risky.  I’m throwing away 3 tanks, 1 artillery and 3 infantry to get 3 infantry, 1 armor, 1 fighter and 1 artillery.  28 IPC from Russia and 75% of their starting tanks for 28 IPC from Germany and 1 of their 6 fighters.  That battle can go horribly wrong (and for me usually does) resulting in maybe not taking it or only having 1 tank left to defend.  Though I’ve seen it go horribly wrong for Germany, is that really a risk Russia wants to take on in the first round of the game?

Actually I now think the Ukraine attack is the preferable option. You do not get many opportunities to knock out that amount of German offensive gear, so take the risk. It’s not much of a risk, like switch said average of 3 tanks survive it. It is a risk you want to take on the first round because the averages don’t support your conclusion that it goes horribly wrong.

[frood]

@Cmdr:

And a drain on Japanese resources allowing American to pummel Japan to death without loss.

Okay, with minimal losses.

I LOVE how your brain works!

One-time use of a few Jap air units to attack small UK fleet in Pacific

Drain of Japanese resources

US can take Japan with only minimal losses.

:? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :?

Oh and did I say  :? ?

[Jennifer]

@ncscswitch:

I am so glad you misread my post.

I NEVER said that Japan was cowering in SZ60.
I said they could REINFORCE SZ60 immediately, while UK was a suicide fleet, and USA was slow to reinforce.

So you admit it was a strawman.

I could easily say that America could reinforce their fleet immediately too, in SZ 55 or SZ 54.

What’s your point?  Other then trying to tell me you are both defending Japan and threatening America’s fleet and moving to sink England’s fleet.  Cause you just cannot have the same ships in three different sea zones and you’d have too do that to get everything you say you want to do done.

Just face it.  If you attack the English fleet, America can exploit Japan.  If you attack the American fleet, England can exploit Japan.  If you attack nothing then BOTH America and England can exploit you.  If you attack BOTH, then you’ll decimate your fleet nine times over and be unable to recover allowing America to exploit you.

No matter what you choose, you’re going to get exploited.  I have yet to see Japan defend successfully against a concerted KJF.  The only defense that’s worked is a lucky and very aggressive Germany.  And sometimes, that doesn’t work out too well either.

[Crazy Ivan]

:-o
Jennifer,
  Are you proposing that the allies should always try the KJF then?
  As it is a better strategy than KGF because it would be easier, or is it just quicker, because Japan is weaker than Germany?

And anybody,
  What can the Axis do to offset the evil plans of the Allies trying the KJF strategy?
  :roll: