It seems to me like in a lot of cases retreat would not be an option, unless like Black Elk said they could choose any adjacent friendly territory.
Here’s an example using 1942.2 with Germany and Russia:
Germany starts with 3 infantry, 1 artillery, 1 tank and 1 fighter in Ukraine.
Russia starts with 3 infantry, 1 artillery and 1 tank in Caucasus.
Russia decides to send 2 infantry, 1 artillery to Ukraine from Caucasus, 1 infantry, 1 tank to W Russia from Caucasus.
Germany sends 3 infantry, 1 artillery, 1 tank and 1 fighter to Caucasus from Ukraine.
Now there is a border clash. Let’s say Germany wins losing 2 infantry. Now Germany has 1 infantry, 1 artillery, 1 tank and 1 fighter that move on into the Caucasus. Basically, Germany now takes control of the Caucasus.
Let’s say the battle in W. Russia goes badly for Russia and they decide to retreat the 1 infantry and 1 tank that came from Caucasus.
How would you handle this retreat? Would they go to Russia or Kazakhstan?
Or would they go back to Caucasus and fight the German units there? If this were the case, would they act as attackers or defenders?
Or, if neither Russia or Kazakhstan were available as retreat options, I guess the infantry and tank simply fight on in W Russia until they are destroyed?
PLay test rules mordern axis and allies
-
I was looking over this. and I was thinking if China needed an AC to start with. It seems like china will build an aircraft carrier soon so we will be play testing to see if this AC should be included for balancing purposes. It would be off kwantwang.
-
I moved some of the navy units around and will post the new setup tommorrow
-
It would be off kwantwang.
Other places include further north. I think thats where the shipyard facilities are at the moment anyway.
Could also put it in south Asia near Malaysia where much of China’s shipping goes thru.
-
It would be off kwantwang.
Other places include further north. I think thats where the shipyard facilities are at the moment anyway.
Could also put it in south Asia near Malaysia where much of China’s shipping goes thru.
its also to stop the Japanese from making a serious attack on Round 1. kwantwang is worth 7 ipcs. shame to lose that and its navy on Rd 1.
-
Things to test for:
Which is the best Victory objective( 10 VC vs. 11)
Should the AC should be taken away form China
Should the Libyan fighter be moved to Egypt
Is Russia’s east too weak.
Can russia viably build navy in the Black and eastern sea without going IC crazy
To make sure the game is fun :mrgreen:
anything else we should look out for? -
Rule update 10/12/07, go to first page
-
What do you think about allowing submarines(only) to move from sz 4 to sz 62 and vice versa?This would russia’s navy problem and I think is very reasonable. Also moving the persian IC to the caucuses. That makes more sense because INdia is right next to persia and if you think of the caucuses’ economy versus iran’s.
-
it should be logical as nuclear submarines have the endurance needed
-
it should be logical as nuclear submarines have the endurance needed
I don’t get it. are you saying the arctic circle thing is illogical or logical.
-
hes saying they should be allowed to travel from both sea zones (under north pole)
-
yep arctic circle thing is logical
-
updated 11/10/07 check first page
Suggested Topics
