This is what we do in game. Each neutral has a territory value and some kind of army and a few ships. You can attack them if you want. But u need to capture each neutral territory to get icp income.
If you lose battle then just that lone neutral joins other side.
But we also have a cost to try and influence a strict neutral to your side and you receive the territory value towards income and what is there for the ground troops and a possible ship. Nothing stronger than a Destroyer.
Not all countries can influence the same neutrals. We roll a d20 and a 4 or less u get neutral.
This is just an idea u may look at.
Spain and Turkey have the biggest Amy but cost more for those 2 to try and get.
PLay test rules mordern axis and allies
-
Rule update 10/12/07, go to first page
-
What do you think about allowing submarines(only) to move from sz 4 to sz 62 and vice versa?This would russia’s navy problem and I think is very reasonable. Also moving the persian IC to the caucuses. That makes more sense because INdia is right next to persia and if you think of the caucuses’ economy versus iran’s.
-
it should be logical as nuclear submarines have the endurance needed
-
it should be logical as nuclear submarines have the endurance needed
I don’t get it. are you saying the arctic circle thing is illogical or logical.
-
hes saying they should be allowed to travel from both sea zones (under north pole)
-
yep arctic circle thing is logical
-
updated 11/10/07 check first page





