@Arthur:
I have noticed that the major differences with BM are:
- Moscow is not doomed to fall on G7-ish. You can hold out for a much longer time even with a modest help of UK fighters. A couple extra infantry a round makes a big difference.
Not to mention that several fighters represent a realistic defense to strategic bombing. This is the best change in BM, by far!
@Arthur:
- Japan cannot rapidly conquer all of China; they have to pick a focus of India or China
Yeah, I’ve been ignoring most of China lately, even Chahar which you can take J1. Just focus on Anwhe, Hunan, Yunnan and maybe Kweichow.
@oysteilo:
And then there are marines, don’t get me started on this. I REALLY don’t see the need for this unit
I like the idea of them but I think they’re too overpowered at present.
@Karl7:
The extra UK bucks usually keep the UK above 30, which is good. But a lot of that goes into securing the Med, so end up with some sunk costs, like airbases and carriers that don’t do a lot except ward off air attacks.
Don’t know about it being good. UK is a bit of a monster in BM, unlike the cripple it was in the war and is in OOB.
Generally, the strategies in BM are similar to OOB, with small variations for the new objectives. Although from BM3 I’ve been doing a G1 DOW to nerf the Soviets before they get too many troops. Surprisingly, in a couple of games this has seen Japan get strong. I would imagine that a J1 DOW isn’t nearly as good in BM because of the guerilla fighters in China and extra Allied money.