I’ve been researching France in World War 2 recently, and I stumbled upon this article on JSTOR:
Unfortunately, my regular free JSTOR account cannot access this.
Please let me know if you have access to this article in any way. Thank you!
Barbarossa
-
I posted my previous message as my assessment of one factor leading to the failure of the German campaign in Russia. I then went looking for a source to back me up and lo and behold, it seems there are no original thoughts because Bevin Alexander, an author on military history, comes to the same conclusion:
His most disastrous error was to go into the Soviet Union as a conqueror instead of a liberator. The Soviet people had suffered enormously at the hands of the Communist autocracy for two decades. Millions had died when the Reds forced people off their land to create collective farms. Millions more were obliged to move great distances to work long hours, under terrible conditions, and little compensation in factories and construction projects. The secret police punished any resistance with death or transportation to horrible prison gulags in Siberia. In the gruesome purges of the 1930s, Joseph Stalin had systematically killed all leaders and all military officers who, in his paranoid mind, posed the slightest threat to his dictatorship. Life for the ordinary Russian was drab, full of exhausting work, and dangerous. At the same time, the Soviet Union was an empire ruling over a collection of subjugated peoples who were violently opposed to rule from the Kremlin.
Vast numbers of these people would have risen in rebellion if Hitler’s legions had entered with the promise of freedom and elimination of Soviet oppression. Had Hitler done this, the Soviet Union would have collapsed.
http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/articles/barbarossa.aspx
SS
-
In the case of Greece Hitler had no choice. Italy invaded w/o consultation of her partner and was soundly defeated and proven not ready for a general war in 1940.
Of course Hitler had a choice concerning Greece, and consequently he initially decided not to intervene at the time the italians was pushed back through Albania. Instead he decided to invade Greece as late as april 1941. If he had invaded greece much earlier (fx. by overseas landings from Italian territory), it can be argued that the invation of Yugoslavia could have been avoided since the political situation on the Balkans then probably would have been much different by march 1941.
Yugoslavia was becoming a minor axis ally untill her pro german gov. got thrown out of power.
That’s my point. It’s very thinkable that the Yugoslavian change in power would not have appeared in circumstances were the Germans and the Italians would already control Creece (practically surrounding Yugoslavia).
-
I would have waited until 1942 to attack and done 3 things to prepare. 1)Get Spain to declare war and take Gibralter. 2)Cleared out the Med so it was safe to reinforce Africa. 3) Pushed the Africa Korp up through into the middle east. (establishing more ports to cut logisitics.
That way when the invasion happened the Caucus would be in immediate danger. As a bonus this could have also potentialy lost Britian India with the threat of the Germans from the west and the Japs from the east.
-
I would have tricked Stalin into a joint attack on Turkey and the middle east helping out Rommel and removing the Brits from the middle east… then while the Soviets were getting beaten by Turkey… i would conclude a treaty with them ( Turkey) and attack the entire eastern front while getting Turkey to fight with me. This would have thrown the Soviets off balance.
Then Rommel would reach Mosul and attack the caucasus from the south with Turkish help and i would have the oil in 1941.
-
@Imperious:
I would have tricked Stalin into a joint attack on Turkey and the middle east helping out Rommel and removing the Brits from the middle east… then while the Soviets were getting beaten by Turkey… i would conclude a treaty with them ( Turkey) and attack the entire eastern front while getting Turkey to fight with me. This would have thrown the Soviets off balance.
Then Rommel would reach Mosul and attack the caucasus from the south with Turkish help and i would have the oil in 1941.
like stalin was that stupid. stalin and hitler hated each other and there were plans for a major russian adttack to break the treaty. communists and facists can’t work together on anything.
-
This is not true at all. Discussion in Dec 1940 were in initial stages of progress, however Stalin did not want to have any agreements of the sort unless Germany renounced any and all ties to Finland. Stalin claimed it was in his sphere of influence but Hitler didnt like the fact that it might have also influenced Sweden (by new diplomatic pressures by the Kremlin) to stop Iron Ore shipments to the Reich.
Stalin was quite interested in Persia and getting a natural warm water port in Europe. That is a historical Russian objective since modern times and Turkey was but one factor in its way. Stalin mistrusted the British more than Hitler and more than anybody. He loathed Churchill and considered them duplicitous.
If Stalin was smart he would have allowed and accepted the diplomatic correspondence coming from British and American Intelligence warning Stalin of inpending German aggression. He feared that if he was too mobilize he would make the same mistake as the Czar had done in 1914 and ordered full mobilization which forced the Kaisers decision to also mobilize and begin the chain that started WW1. Stalin did not want to be provoked into a general war with Germany at this time. Thats why they basically got chumped in the first 2 weeks of the campaign. Stalin didnt listen and he was Stupid at times.
Of course Zhukov ordered a study of a preemtive attack on the Reich but this was rejected out right by Stalin for the time being. In my opinion he was eventually preparing for such a conclusion, but if those talks with Von Ribbentropp went well and Germany released Finland to “the wolves” then i feel Stalin would have been much more receptive to co-axis cooperation in the middle east.
-
If anybody cares, the 22nd was the 66th anniversary of Barbarossa.
-
POP QUIZ!
What was Operation Barbarossa named after?
-
Operation winterstorm. (Attack againt moscow 10-02-41)
AL.
-
It was called Operation Typhon if im not mistaken
-
Operation Winter Storm was an attack on Stalingrad, and Typhoon was the Soviet Defense and Counter attack around Moscow.
I was more referring to what “Barbarossa” meant…
GG
-
like stalin was that stupid. stalin and hitler hated each other and there were plans for a major russian adttack to break the treaty. communists and facists can’t work together on anything.
Don’t forget that the Nazi party’s official title was, “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”.
-
operation barbarossa was in the honor of frederik barbarossa a german king of 12th century.
About Operation Typhoon. Imperious Leader is right.
About Operation Winter storm. You’re right.AL.
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Typhoon
Sorry, I was mistaken in assuming Imperious was referring to Barbarossa as Typhoon… And you are correct!
GG
-
The Start date is the clue.
-
I agree with all of IL’s points. I like many of you thikn that Hilter’s persecution of local the populace hurt him more than it helped him innumerally. However, as I recall Hitler split his forces into three spearheads, one to the south, one to the north, one for moscow. Perhaps eliminating one of those spearheads to bolster the other two and he would have gone the extra 20 miles to Moscow.
-
Hmmm… I just learned that the German Army’s invading the Soviet Union where blessed by the Pope. Apparently, Barbarossa was seen as a crusade against communism, hence the name, Barbarossa. Fighting fire with fire it seems.
-
Yes it was a crusade. Thats how the Germans were able to recruit so many units from foreign nations for the opportunity to fight communism even from nations she conquered.
-
@Imperious:
Yes it was a crusade. Thats how the Germans were able to recruit so many units from foreign nations for the opportunity to fight communism even from nations she conquered.
they should da known facism is worst.
-
They were promised representation under the new order. The fear of communism since 1918 over much of Europe was a much more uncertain prospect. At least Fascism had a free market system while its labor system was organized under guilds
Suggested Topics
