• '18 '17 '16 '15 Customizer

    @Wolfshanze:

    Having said that, and my personal views of the X-men franchise… I was deeply moved by Logan… it was a really, Really, REALLY good movie… so this is not some X-men fan-boy reaction to the movie… it was so good, it makes me want to go back and see the other movies I missed (like Days of Future Past)… I might regret the decision to go back and dig up the X-men movies I missed, but Logan was so good, I want to see all of them now.

    I always thought X2 was good for some reason. Seems a bit pedestrian by today’s standards, but it has a good story to it. First Class and Days of Future past were decent. The actors are great and there are some excellent moments. (Fall into middle category below)

    I guess that I have three categories of films:

    • those that aren’t worth watching
    • those that are worth watching for cultural or entertainment value and
    • those that are of high quality or appeal and have a re-watchability that merits actually owning them

    X-Men (2000) is terrible. Particularly when viewed in 2017. It is outright corny. Supposedly it was well received at the time, but I don’t get it. It’s worth watching if you truly intend to go back and see them all, if only to get perspective on where the franchise began. But last time I saw it I didn’t have a good opinion.

    All the rest of the movies blur together for me. I remember seeing X-Men Origins: Wolverine and being underwhelmed.

    @Wolfshanze:

    Marvel has been hitting movies really right lately, especially the entire Avengers franchise and its supporting cast of Super Hero movies and tie-ins… Logan is really a quality movie but it’s not really comparable with any other Marvel movie other than the fact Marvel hit this one out of the park. If only Marvel had treated the X-men franchise as well as they treated the Avengers and Logan movie… that would have been something.

    I don’t mind a film that stands on its own as excellent, even if it is part of a series. As long as it can be watched as a single film. Iron Man was like that for me. I love the first one… the sequels not so much.

    As for Marvel’s involvement, I know that in the first two films it was basically zero. At least their name isn’t associated with the production. So they weren’t able to give input on the basis of the series. Seems like they came in the middle and gradually have been given more creative sway. Kinda similar to the 5 Spiderman films we have had up to now. Spiderman is a Marvel character, but Sony had total creative rights on the films and didn’t have to coordinate them with Marvel’s input or future plans.

    Clearly both Sony and 20th Century Fox have hedged their bets a little and cooperated with Marvel/Disney to some degree now. I think they have at least partly recognized that Disney is both doing it right and has established something so massive that it is better to work together than try to compete. At least in regards to these two properties.

    @Wolfshanze:

    Oh, and PS… if you do go see Logan in theater… yes, it’s a Marvel movie, but NO… don’t wait till the end of the credits… Logan was far too serious to put a sneak peak at the end of the credits… in fact, the sneak peak is at the beginning of Logan… so when the movie ends, go ahead and leave the theatre, you won’t miss anything!

    Good. I think the post credits crap is annoying.

  • '18 '17 '16 '15 Customizer

    @Imperious:

    Shia LaBeouf and Megan Fox can’t act their way out of a bag. The worst actors in History

    Good thing they aren’t in any of these movies then.

  • '22 '20 '19 '18 '17 '16

    One thing I have to say about DC’s attempt at a cinematic universe is I can’t stand how they continue to double down on Zach Snyder’s drab and dark color palettes. To IL’s point Marvel/Disney have a formula down pat, but it works for the most part. One of the factors are the brighter lighting and colors, which invigorates the film. While those films have plenty of flaws, they’re often much easier to sit through.

    I’m not a comic book guy either but I do wish we got a straight adaptation of The Dark Knight Returns instead of having elements of it be sprinkled into films.

  • '18 '17 '16 '15 Customizer

    @General:

    One thing I have to say about DC’s attempt at a cinematic universe is I can’t stand how they continue to double down on Zach Snyder’s drab and dark color palettes. To IL’s point Marvel/Disney have a formula down pat, but it works for the most part. One of the factors are the brighter lighting and colors, which invigorates the film. While those films have plenty of flaws, they’re often much easier to sit through.

    I could not agree with you more.

    I was actually looking over DCs films trying to comprehend how and why Zack Snyder is the architect of their whole universe. I figured it had to be due to the success of 300 and the cult appeal of Watchmen. But his style is so unique (in a bad way) that it pollutes everything it touches. There are elements of his films that can be visually beautiful, but 95% of the time it feels overproduced, unbelievable and too visually perfect. The aesthetic and tone prevent his films from being taken seriously.

    I just don’t know why DC/WB gave this guy the keys to their classic car. He’s wrecking it.


  • I am waiting on the SW 8 Trailer for this year. Also it is confirmed I think, that they are going to make a Han Spin-Off next year.

    Thor - Ragnarök is coming out this year. Has anyone else watched the Trailer of it yet?

  • '17 '16

    Confirmed… Carrie Fisher will be staring in Star Wars Episode 9… yes, that’s not a typo… not Episode 8 (which she already filmed), she will be staring in Episode 9 as well.

    Mickey Mouse and Goofy paid a visit to the Fisher family and “after negotiations” they all agreed Carrie should star in Episode 9.

    Carrie Fisher was right when she said she didn’t even own her own body.


  • Has anyone seen the Fate of the Furious yet? I need to know if its OK to take my little brother to see it(He’s 11).

  • '22 '20 '19 '18 '17 '16

    I can’t think of a better movie to take an 11-year old boy to see.  :-D

    It’s PG-13 and from what I can remember there’s not much swearing, plus there’s no gore to speak of. There’s plenty of expected cleavage and skin for the Havana race setting (one of the best sequences in the movie) but nothing else.

    As a caper movie series (5 and 6 being the best) it’s grown bigger and bigger (from taking down a tank and a plane in 6 to jumping from planes and skyscrapers in 7 to the sub in this one) but I wouldn’t mind for them to end the series on a smaller scale and revert back to the basics of fast cars. But it would be perfectly fine for Jason Statham and the Rock to have their own spinoff movie.


  • @General:

    I can’t think of a better movie to take an 11-year old boy to see.  :-D

    It’s PG-13 and from what I can remember there’s not much swearing, plus there’s no gore to speak of. There’s plenty of expected cleavage and skin for the Havana race setting (one of the best sequences in the movie) but nothing else.

    As a caper movie series (5 and 6 being the best) it’s grown bigger and bigger (from taking down a tank and a plane in 6 to jumping from planes and skyscrapers in 7 to the sub in this one) but I wouldn’t mind for them to end the series on a smaller scale revert back to the basics of fast cars. But it would be perfectly fine for Jason Statham and the Rock to have their own spinoff movie.

    Thanks man. He will enjoy, i am certain.

  • '18 '17 '16 '15 Customizer

    Should be the final trailer for Dunkirk:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KLeFboA8gc


  • @LHoffman:

    Should be the final trailer for Dunkirk:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KLeFboA8gc

    Damn. Looks awesome.


  • Reminds me of The Battle of Britain in style.

  • '18 '17 '16 '15 Customizer

    @Imperious:

    Reminds me of The Battle of Britain in style.

    Almost exactly so; very good comparison. It has the appeal of a 70s epic war film.

    Especially with the narrative seemingly to lack focus on a single character or group of characters. Nolan disclosed that there are three separate story lines: land, air and sea.

    Beyond the startlingly realistic visual appeal, the trailers haven’t been earth-shatteringly dramatic. But I think that is good, there doesn’t appear to be a lot of action fluff. I am really looking forward to seeing it.

  • '18 '17 '16 '15 Customizer

    Just saw Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2.

    Thought the first was overrated, but this one was actually quite good.


  • Thanks for the link to The trailer,  Hoffman. I Cannot wait.

  • Customizer

    @wittmann:

    Thanks for the link to The trailer,  Hoffman. I Cannot wait.

    Unlike Hitler’s panzers, who he told to stop and wait to allow the British army to escape. Amazing that they can dress this up as a triumph.

  • '18 '17 '16 '15 Customizer

    @Flashman:

    @wittmann:

    Thanks for the link to The trailer,�  Hoffman. I Cannot wait.

    Unlike Hitler’s panzers, who he told to stop and wait to allow the British army to escape. Amazing that they can dress this up as a triumph.

    That’s the one thing that sticks in my mind to sour the film a bit… That the situation may not have been as dire as they make it seem. The Germans could have wiped them out, but chose not to.

    This is a British flag-waver though. That’s fine. With Nolan production value and accurate, even if incomplete, telling of events, I can enjoy Dunkirk as a good film.


  • @LHoffman:

    Just saw Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2.

    Thought the first was overrated, but this one was actually quite good.

    GOTG 2 is the strongest sequel after Winter Soldier. With the first GOTG it makes the strongest 1-2 of all the Marvel films. The first Captain America is my favorite but it’s 1-2 are very tonally different.


  • Unlike Hitler’s panzers, who he told to stop and wait to allow the British army to escape. Amazing that they can dress this up as a triumph.

    They did that with Pearl Harbor. Remember that cook shot down 300 Japanese planes and single highhandedly sunk 2 carriers, then the two lover boys totally destroyed Japan with the Doolittle raid. Thats payback for sinking our fleet!

  • '18 '17 '16 '15 Customizer

    @Imperious:

    Unlike Hitler’s panzers, who he told to stop and wait to allow the British army to escape. Amazing that they can dress this up as a triumph.

    They did that with Pearl Harbor. Remember that cook shot down 300 Japanese planes and single highhandedly sunk 2 carriers, then the two lover boys totally destroyed Japan with the Doolittle raid. Thats payback for sinking our fleet!

    :lol:

    Well that was just total schlock from Michael Bay. I know we’ll get something more grounded from Nolan.

Suggested Topics

Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

40

Online

17.7k

Users

40.4k

Topics

1.8m

Posts